Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stainlessbanner; shuckmaster
FYI
2 posted on 01/24/2003 9:07:34 AM PST by one2many ( "Truth is the one worthy Grail; follow where she leads")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: one2many
Who then is responsible for the war? Although the South would have preferred any honorable compromise to the fratricidal war which has taken place.

Can anyone point me to historical evidence that the South was willing to compromise rather than taking up arms? It seems to me that Lincoln was abundantly clear that he did not intend to interfere with slavery in the slave states, and even insofar as necessary to abide by the Dred Scot decision, which it seems to me effectively extended the institution of slavery to the territories. What Lincoln repeated said, in effect, was that he would prefer to contain slavery so as to set it "on a path to eventual extinction". However it seems like the path to eventually extinction had no timetable, and that if the slave states would have not taken up arms, under Lincolns approach slavery might has lasted another 100 years. So, please enlighten me, what evidence is there that the slave states had worked for "any honorable compromise" as General Lee asserts?

26 posted on 01/28/2003 8:08:09 AM PST by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson