Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear fusion could power NASA spacecraft
New Scientist ^ | 10:29 23 January 03 | Duncan Graham-Rowe

Posted on 01/24/2003 8:01:30 AM PST by vannrox

Nuclear fusion could power NASA spacecraft

 
10:29 23 January 03

Duncan Graham-Rowe

 

The journey time from Earth orbit to Mars could be slashed from six months to less than six weeks if NASA's idea for a nuclear fusion-powered engine takes off.

The space-flight engine is being developed by a team led by Bill Emrich, an engineer at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. He predicts his fusion drive would be able to generate 300 times the thrust of any chemical rocket engine and use only a fraction of its fuel mass.

That means interplanetary missions would no longer need to wait for a "shortest journey" launch window. "You can launch when you want," Emrich says.

The principle is to sustain an on-board fusion reaction and fire some of the energy created out the back of the spacecraft, generating thrust. Of course, harnessing fusion is no easy task. Scientists have struggled to contain the super-hot plasmas of charged ions needed for fusion reactions.


Bare nuclei

To achieve fusion, scientists heat the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium to at least 100 million kelvin. This strips electrons from the isotopes, creating a plasma of bare nuclei. If this plasma is hot and dense enough, the two types of nuclei fuse, giving off neutrons and huge amounts of energy.

 
Fusion jet

However, the plasma can only be contained by strong magnetic fields, and creating containment fields that do not leak has proved very difficult. What is more, no one has managed to generate a stable fusion reaction that passes the "break-even" point, where the reaction is generating more energy than it takes to sustain it.

Fortunately for Emrich, the reaction would not need to go far beyond the break-even point to generate thrust. And containment is less of a headache because you actually want some of the plasma to escape, he says. "That's where the thrust comes from."

The problem is 100 million kelvin is not hot enough to generate thrust. At that temperature, the fusion reaction only generates neutrons, which are uncharged and therefore cannot be steered and fired through a magnetic jet nozzle. To produce thrust, you need charged particles.


Bold solution

Emrich is proposing a bold solution. He wants to use microwaves to heat the plasma to 600 million kelvin, triggering a different kind of fusion reaction that generates not neutrons but charged alpha particles - helium nuclei. These can then be fired from a magnetic nozzle to push the craft along.

Emrich has tested the idea with a scaled-down version using an argon plasma. He found that he could get around many of the containment problems by using a long, cylindrical magnetic field with powerful magnets at each end (see graphic).

In a fusion drive, the fields at the end could easily be controlled to release the highly energetic alpha particles and propel the craft.

If fusion researchers can ever achieve stable, break-even fusion, Emrich believes a full-scale fusion drive - perhaps 100 metres long - could be ready and waiting within two decades. He will reveal his plan in full at a space technology forum in Albuquerque, New Mexico, next week.

 
10:29 23 January 03
 

Return to news story

  © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

 



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: explore; launch; mars; moon; nasa; nuclear; power; space; spacecraft; study; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: vannrox
Emrich is proposing a bold solution. He wants to use microwaves to heat the plasma to 600 million kelvin, triggering a different kind of fusion reaction that generates not neutrons but charged alpha particles - helium nuclei. These can then be fired from a magnetic nozzle to push the craft along. Emrich has tested the idea with a scaled-down version using an argon plasma. He found that he could get around many of the containment problems by using a long, cylindrical magnetic field with powerful magnets at each end (see graphic). In a fusion drive, the fields at the end could easily be controlled to release the highly energetic alpha particles and propel the craft.

Currently satillites use Boeing Zenon Thrusters...Zenon being the gas used for ignition.

For the past decade myself have operated a "Cryogenic Nitrogen" gas Plasma unit...designed to cut steel and alloy steel..[our machine also does this process underwater].
This Plasma set up has special nozzles and insulators for this application.
Magnetic sheilding sounds deep..but my Plasma has magnetic shielding too.
We had some "Biggy" detonations at the Plasma head..which saw failure due to inconsistancy of metal compostion in the nozzle and sometimes due to the insulators.
Distances of microns can be critical...the energy must continuous flow one direction..if there is any particle stream diversion or leakage during ignition...Kaboom!
Really cool watching the Ion stream cut the steel...after ones eyes adjust to the light[one is wearing protective lensed glasses]..after the white/yellow glow dissapates,you can see this stream of Ions[the Ion stream is blue]...cut the steel like butter...over 8"thick.
As the main article conveys...its just containment...the engineers at NASA will figure it out.

21 posted on 01/24/2003 9:32:37 AM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
New Scientist has joined Debka and Stratfor in the fantasy department.
22 posted on 01/24/2003 10:23:00 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
He predicts his fusion drive would be able to generate 300 times the thrust of any chemical rocket engine and use only a fraction of its fuel mass.

My warp drive engine would be able to get you there in a nanosecond -- and mine will be ready as quickly as his will.
23 posted on 01/24/2003 10:28:17 AM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
They will eventually succeed, just keep plugging along.
24 posted on 01/24/2003 10:48:23 AM PST by Intimidator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
My memory is a little fuzzy, but I seem to remember that an experimental fusion reactor was built at some university in New England; MIT perhaps. It's name was something like Tomahawk. I thought that they successfully initiated fusion reactions that were very brief, as in nanoseconds.
25 posted on 01/24/2003 10:48:46 AM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Bird
That would most certainly burn the roof of my mouth.

Caution: Handle with potholder.

27 posted on 01/24/2003 2:13:13 PM PST by VadeRetro (Worse than those platters in Mexican restaurants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
.... but I seem to remember that an experimental fusion reactor was built at some university in New England; MIT perhaps. It's name was something like Tomahawk. I thought that they successfully initiated fusion reactions that were very brief, as in nanoseconds.

"Tokamak," perhaps?

28 posted on 01/24/2003 6:25:34 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
That's the one--at Princeton
29 posted on 01/24/2003 7:19:15 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
That would most certainly burn the roof of my mouth.


Almost as hot as molten Peeps.
30 posted on 01/24/2003 7:25:40 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson