Posted on 01/23/2003 11:21:11 AM PST by Shermy
Scott Ritter said he doesn't want forgiveness.
Speaking publicly for the first time about the sex charge he was arrested for in 2001, the former U.N. arms inspector and one of the leading critics of the Bush administration's plans to attack Iraq said he has been held accountable for breaking the law. And it would be a shame, he said Wednesday, that his arrest could derail his efforts to help prevent a war in the Middle East.
"I think it's important to put a human face on this, to remind people that there are issues out there bigger than a two-year-old dismissed case," he said. "I'm not asking people for forgiveness.
In June 2001, he was charged in a police sting operation with trying to lure a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet to a Burger King. Later in Colonie Town Court, the case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal after six months. Half a year later, the case was sealed.
"I was arrested on June 15 (2001) and charged with a class B misdemeanor," he said. "I think it's important for people to know that I stood before a judge in a public court, with my wife by my side ... and the case was dismissed."
Ritter, 41, a Delmar resident, spent Wednesday afternoon in a frenzy of television and newspaper interviews. He had been at the center of a national controversy that exploded this week when the arrest came to light.
A former Marine, Ritter served as a U.N. weapons inspector for seven years. He resigned in 1998, saying that Iraq remained a threat. He also accused the United States of damaging the inspection process by using intelligence from the U.N. to determine subsequent bombing sites.
In September, Ritter visited Iraq to urge Saddam Hussein to allow inspectors back into the country. Hussein agreed to do that a few days after Ritter left.
On Wednesday, Ritter said he's trying to put his life back together after the attention of the last few days. He declined to speculate on who may have released information from the sealed file.
"The timing is definitely suspicious," he said. "I have no insights as to who or why. I know what the impact is, which was to prevent me from getting on an airplane as I planned to do so ... to fly to Baghdad."
Ritter was to fly to Iraq on Tuesday to meet with the country's government, along with many other figures in the peace movement, to help avoid a war. Ritter bowed out of the trip because of the recent attention.
Colonie police Chief John Grebert said he did not blame any of his staff for the controversy. Though the case was sealed, he said, his detectives were not barred from talking about it, according to two lawyers he consulted. Furthermore, the case had been reported on Channel 13 in 2001 and many people were already familiar with it.
"This case is going on two years old," he said. "This case has been discussed fairly openly over the past year. A person who becomes more and more of a public figure increases the chance that anyone's going to talk."
WNYT Ch. 13 had the story on the arrest in 2001, but did not identify the man charged as the former weapons inspector. The station has said Ritter was charged under his given name -- William S. Ritter -- and the station did not make the connection at the time.
Ritter said this would be the last time he plans to discuss the situation with the media. He said he has been encouraged by hundreds of positive e-mails from around the country. His family is also with him.
"I'm very supportive of Scott, 100 percent or more," said his wife, Marina. "I'm very proud of him and everything that he has achieved."
Ritter and Marina, who married 12 years ago after they met in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia, are parents of two young children. Ritter said it was difficult explaining to his kids about what happened, but expects to soon put this behind him.
"I will continue to speak where I'm invited and permitted to speak," he said. "This will not silence me."
Staff writer Mike Goodwin contributed to this report.
Ha!
There must have been some chuckles and high-fiving at the WH, when Ritter's been on TV, and they've known they could lower the boom on him any time they wanted. I wonder if someone at the Schenectady Gazette (or whichever it was) is in trouble? Surely this was supposed to be big news on Peace Activist Weekend, not three days later.
Ritter voted for Bush, BTW.
What did CC say? I can't stand to watch her moan, bitch and whine while spewing DNC mantras as news?
I didn't watch her either, but my understanding from what was reported here on FR was that she said the judge had worked for Bush in FL and was the one who leaked the news about Ritter.
What do you think of the news today that at least one inspector was blackmailed by Iraq. Any thoughts on who that might be?
If it does turn out that Ritter was, in fact, blackmailed for his reprehensible behavior, I hope you can muster up some indignation over that.
He says.
His word is worth less than nothing, in my book.
I don't know if certain media and leftists *believed* him, but they certainly wanted him to serve as a leading anti-war voice and Bush administration critic.
IF those media types knew that he was involved in activity that made him susceptible to blackmail, yet presented him as a legitimate spokesman for "the cause", I consider them, well,--I hesitate to use the word,--I'll say I consider them in the same category.
And perhaps it was thought that if he said he voted for President Bush that would make his criticism more impressive. (I, of course, have no idea who he voted for)
Ritter, I guess.
Here's a guy who has such strong perverted urges that, two months after being busted on similar charges, and while under investigation by the FBI, he fell for the simplest of honey traps. You can't tell me that sort of behaviour suddenly developed in 2001. They knew about it when he was selected for the UNSCOM team. The only real question is, was he ordered to play along with the Iraqi setup, or did they found out about it later? Given that it's generally accepted that UNSCOM had more than its share of US spies aboard, my guess is the former. Whatever, you've got to give the CIA its due. One can only guess at the value of the material Ritter's turned over during debriefings. And then to undercut the 'peace' movement like this, just before the war starts? What a champagne finish to a great asset. There'll be some admiring nods at Mossad HQ over this one, if they weren't already in on it.
I was just pointing out the idiocy of the comment by jim_trent that he is now qualified to run as a Libertarian candidate.
It just gets tiresome watching this collection of idiots who try to turn every single thread on this forum into a Libertarian thread. This thread is about Scott Ritter - Pedophile. It has nothing to do with his affiliation.
I voted for Bush, btw.
"This is about war and peace...etc."
Gibson's summary (also paraphrased:
"Reality check: War and peace should be handled by those with enough sense to leave the kids alone."
I agree.
But I'm not as sure as you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.