Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellinahandcart
The roblem with the first designs was that they were hamstrung by 1) the victim mentality that refuses to build on the footprints and 2) the directive that the new buildings hold the same amount of office space. The second set of plans were a result of letting the archeticts(sp) run wild and be creative.

Just rebuilding the old towers would be a thousand times more asthetically pleasing, yes.

But that doesn't change the fact that I hated the old towers. They looked like a spaceship landed in the middle of our skyline.

Or more accurately, they looked like someone built a 1970's building smack in the middle of a bunch of 1900-1930's buildings.

46 posted on 01/22/2003 6:17:05 PM PST by Oschisms (Make it tall, no matter what)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson