Last reply to one of your kind.
Raping a retarded female is not accepted as a normal accepted act by any normal adult human male.
Most males do not rape females, nor do they celebrate or condone the rape of females, retarded or not.
Men and women of normal intelligence do not require the judicial system to determine the definitian of an illegal and universally measuured immoral act.
There is no possible moral justification of rape.
Does your probation officer know you have internet access?
Do you think it possible that the rapist didn't know that the victim was retarded? The judge thought so. Do you think it possible that the rape was actually consensual sex? Could it be that Norwegian law protects the retarded, in the same way that American laws protect minors - that is, the law states that certain people, by definition, are incapable of giving consent?
Taken together, these two possibilities suggest a third - that the judge acted correctly.