Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog
She flat out said that the judge was hired by Bush to do to Florida for the recount and "maybe" that's why this was leaked now, because Ritter is so critical of the president.
42 posted on 01/22/2003 2:47:26 PM PST by Howlin (Fly your flag in support of President Bush's State of the Union Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
The Judge was in FLA during the recount??
48 posted on 01/22/2003 2:49:11 PM PST by Dog (TAG LINE SALE: Bargain basement prices all inventory must go --- -- Fast Doggies used tag lines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Has the judge been identified yet?
56 posted on 01/22/2003 2:52:30 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
She flat out said that the judge was hired by Bush to do to Florida for the recount and "maybe" that's why this was leaked now, because Ritter is so critical of the president.

Could well be. Could also be that the original sting was directed at Ritter by the feds because of his pro-Soddomite activities, as the gay buchananista Raimondo claims. I don't find these suggestions any less convincing than the suggestion that Ritter was given a pass by a Hillary operative to blackmail him into crusading against Bush. In fact, they are more plausible. But it's all beside the point. We already know Ritter is a turncoat and a traitor. The only interesting question is, how was he turned? That's a mystery no longer.

74 posted on 01/22/2003 2:58:01 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
read the thread back upward to find your comment. I'm astonished if Crier even slightly insinuated a judge would "leak" sealed information, especially for political reasons. Was it a blatant accusation? Sure hope the judge gets her attention real quick.
78 posted on 01/22/2003 2:59:13 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
And maybe Ritter is a sicko who tried to have sex with a 14 year old girl. Ritter is being revealed as a pathetic scum. This case was likely "dismissed" because most states have provisions for alternate programs for first offenders. In other words, you go for treatment and stay out of trouble for 6 months, and it is off your record. BUT you can only use these programs once, so a record of your being in it IS kept.

Ritter is trying to make it sound like a judge dismissed the charge as unfounded. He also doesn't regret his actions? Scary unless he truly is innocent. Maybe less scary than a media that will now support the notion the president is responsible for somebody's pedophilia. IF Ritter did this and feels no remorse for it, I should listen to his judgments on Saddam Hussein?

A last thought: We know the Iraqis employ rape of women as a state policy. Would they hesitate to provide kinky sex to one of their "spokespeople" who has a sex problem?

81 posted on 01/22/2003 2:59:28 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
"She flat out said that the judge was hired by Bush to do to Florida for the recount and "maybe" that's why this was leaked now, because Ritter is so critical of the president."

What neither Crier nor Ritter seem to understand is that when you step into the ring with the big boys, you better be able to slug it out or you're going to get laid out. That's politics. And Ritter is an obvious lightweight with a glass jaw. He hopped into the ring and now he's whining because he got his head handed to him.

291 posted on 01/23/2003 3:35:43 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson