Personally, I completely agree with you. I do not respect their decision either. However, that is not at issue. The issue is should the police power of the government be used to keep a person from depriving another person of their life when the definition of a "person" has no answer? In the latter example, virtually everyone recognizes that we are talking about killing a living person. In the former, we will debate it until Kindom Come.
Honestly, I have no answer. I know what I believe but that is different from many. It is the sole issue with the libertarian philosophy that I have been unable to reconcile.
What makes you a person, and what business is it of the government if I should choose to deprive you of that life?
You seem to grant and miss my point at the same time. I am saying that the debate about personhood is objectively over. Science has spoken, logic speaks, the facts speak. There is no point in the continuum of development from conception to death when it is anything other than a human being.
Dan