No as, again, it would be a violation of that person's right to life. As I said in a subsequent post, my point was that not "every" union of a sperm and an egg is a "person".
I suppose that's where we disagree.
What business does a woman have claiming her baby is her body when it doesn't even have the same DNA? It's not her body. She had a complete body beforehand. The claim that a unique individual, no matter how reliant on the mother's whims is merely a part of a mother's body is ludicrous.
A crawling infant is no less dependant on the mother than a fetus. That doesn't make them the same individual, nor does it justify infanticide.