Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WL-law
I won't deny that the evidence strongly suggests that Ritter is guilty as charged. But why does that mean he was not set up? If he was targeted because of his politics (and that seems possible to me,) "set up" strikes me as an accurate term.
90 posted on 01/22/2003 1:50:33 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
If he is "anonymously" chatting, how does a blackmailer find which chat room Scott Ritter was going to?

Did he go back to the same one where he was busted before?

95 posted on 01/22/2003 2:37:45 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson