Skip to comments.
'Oldest Star Chart' Found (32,500 Years Old)
BBC ^
| 1-21-2003
| Dr. David Whetstone
Posted on 01/21/2003 1:19:52 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Remember that Neanderthal was still around at this time.
1
posted on
01/21/2003 1:19:52 PM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale; JudyB1938; Cool Guy; FreetheSouth!; albee; yoe
Ping.
2
posted on
01/21/2003 1:21:23 PM PST
by
blam
To: All
Look into my eyes! You Vill not Succeed !
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
01/21/2003 1:22:13 PM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: blam
'Oldest Star Chart' Found (32,500 Years Old)Who was Liz Taylor married to back then?
To: blam
Fortean bump.
5
posted on
01/21/2003 1:30:13 PM PST
by
Junior
(Feeling buggy)
To: blam
Love this stuff.
6
posted on
01/21/2003 1:33:38 PM PST
by
happygrl
To: blam
1st Cribbage Board?
7
posted on
01/21/2003 1:39:09 PM PST
by
Waco
To: blam
Could it be something else hanging between his legs?
They were obviously hill or mountain people! They had one short leg so that they could stand erect!
To: blam
It may be a picture of Elvis, too. Noone will ever know which of these conjectures, if any, is correct.
9
posted on
01/21/2003 1:49:03 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: blam
"Remember that Neanderthal was still around at this time."
Yes, liberals were around. They didn't do much, and they complained a lot, but they were there.
To: blam
On one side of the tablet is the man-like being with his legs apart and arms raised. Between his legs hangs what could be a sword and his waist is narrow. His left leg is shorter than his right one. Not bad, considering that the sword wasn't invented for another 25,000 years. Some scholarship.
To: blam
30,000 BC is old enough to be interesting. Egyptians had a substantial mythology involving Orion and his sword. They would paint the Pharoah in a typical Orion pose, which has been interpreted in art class as lacking representational perspective.
To: pabianice
Do you have any other evidence for the date of the invention of the sword beyond the absence (so far) of earlier specimens?
Absence of evidence is not always evidence of absence.
To: pabianice
Between his legs hangs what could be a sword...
Or it could be his club.
To: pabianice
On one side of the tablet is the man-like being with his legs apart and arms raised. Between his legs hangs what could be a sword and his waist is narrow. His left leg is shorter than his right one.
I think this is the writer editorializing...the archaeologists are likely to realize this would likely be some sort of bludgeon, or perhaps a bow or other non-copper/tin/bronze/iron item.
To: blam
"Dr Rappenglueck allowed for this effect by using a computer program to wind back the sky and found evidence for a particular star in Orion that was in a different place all those years ago. "
Too bad they don't tell us if it corresponded to the tablet..
aside from this nit, this level of antiquity is fascinating archaeology, in that something we see still every day is represented SO long ago...
To: FroedrickVonFreepenstein
Look at the size of that thing! Could be a stump!
To: blam
"Whitehouse" is right, "Whetstone" wrong, for Dr. David's last name. Interesting article but a bit of a stretch. Then again, I never see anything in the stars.
To: pabianice
On one side of the tablet is the man-like being with his legs apart and arms raised. Between his legs hangs what could be a sword and his waist is narrow. His left leg is shorter than his right one. Not bad, considering that the sword wasn't invented for another 25,000 years. Some scholarship.
--------------------------------------
LOL! Hey, what are you? Some kind of trouble maker? Don't you know that it's the intention that counts?
19
posted on
01/21/2003 2:53:34 PM PST
by
yankeedame
(Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.)
To: blam
Does anyone have a star chart program handy? Fire it up and tell us how the stars of Orion looked in 30,500 BC. What does 32,500 years of stellar movement do to Orion's shape? (In other words, did it look like the figurine back then?)
20
posted on
01/21/2003 3:01:15 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(Tag, you're it!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson