Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth
So this may not be a slur; it may be the truth.

It is true that whites serve disproportionately in combat arms. However, the author of this article was trying to twist that fact into an argument that these whites should be pitied. On the contrary, they should be admired and emulated. Perhaps the America they come from is still worth fighting for. Perhaps the America of the urban cynic is not.

14 posted on 01/21/2003 12:01:24 AM PST by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: arm958
You may be right about his attitude. However, I think he actually meant what you said, that they don't want to complain, even though they should have the first right of complaint, being the most willing to give their blood to preserve their nation.
15 posted on 01/21/2003 12:07:00 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: arm958
Something else you said reminds me of something my cuz (Army) once said. That rural kids are idealistic and trainable and really know how to work, while city kids are worse than useless as soldiers, due to their attitude.
16 posted on 01/21/2003 12:09:40 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: arm958
I did not see it that the author was twisting anything. The facts were there and that is the salient fact. Rangel and the rest were making a race issue out of it, the author is merely stating the obvious.
47 posted on 01/21/2003 6:29:48 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: arm958
Bttt
54 posted on 01/21/2003 7:02:45 AM PST by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson