[rdf]

The government's briefs are a cold, politically calculated legal argument against "quotas," as practiced by the University of Michigan. They are not documents that offer, as many would have hoped, a sweeping condemnation of race preferences any place in America, or that refute the idiocy of the nauseating blather about creating "diversity" that emanates from the higher-education cartel.

On the mark, Ward!

Cheers,

Richard F.

[TLBSHOW]

bttt

[TLBSHOW]

— WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Tuesday it scheduled arguments on April 1 in two politically charged cases challenging the University of Michigan's affirmative action policies that favor minority applicants.

In the newly released calendar for late March and early April, the justices will hear one hour of arguments in the case on undergraduate admissions and one hour of arguments in the other case on law school admissions.