Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix says Iraq refusing U2 spy flights
HA'ARETZ ^ | January 20th, 2003

Posted on 01/20/2003 12:23:06 PM PST by Mossad1967

Top UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said on Monday Iraq had refused to allow reconnaissance flights by U2 aircraft over its territory to aid inspectors in their search for any weapons of mass destruction...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: Mossad1967
Well, if they're refusing U2 flights, we'll just have to use every other aircraft we have.

My personal favorites include the A-10, the C-130 "Spooky", the F-117, the F-16, the B-57, B-2, and my *sniff!* retired SR-71.

We should fly NASA's Blackbird over Iraq after the war, just for my personal pleasure. ;^)

81 posted on 01/20/2003 1:30:48 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967; All
Oh, we can't do U-2 overflights? Very well, then...

It never ceases to amaze me, how frequently the international community underestimates us. The aircraft pictured above, the SR-71 BLACKBIRD, could overfly any nation on Earth TODAY with impunity. It remains all but unstoppable when at full speed, and it's over 40 years old.

One could be flying in 90 days, if it's not ready as we speak.

82 posted on 01/20/2003 1:30:54 PM PST by Long Cut (Daddy-To-Be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Do we have a plane called the U2?

No, Yes.

They have jazzed up the old U2, given it another designation, that I can't recall, and still fly them.

83 posted on 01/20/2003 1:32:15 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Let me rephrase--satellites aren't provocative to Iraq, because it is impossible for them to do anything about them.
84 posted on 01/20/2003 1:37:09 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
The Air Farce has the TR-1, which is essentially a rebuilt U-2.
85 posted on 01/20/2003 1:38:13 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
It never ceases to amaze me, how frequently the international community underestimates us.

I think you misspelled "misunderestimates."

86 posted on 01/20/2003 1:39:12 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
There was a tactical recon version (TR-1) for a while. Now, they are all U-2Rs, IIRC.
87 posted on 01/20/2003 1:40:14 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
How about WAR?!
88 posted on 01/20/2003 1:40:35 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
According to the History Channel saddam knew the timing of the Sats and halted movement of his equipment to fool them. Have they changed the timing schedules and gone to RANDOM searches? Thou shall NOT establish a pattern was a lesson that should have been learned after Pearl Harbor.
89 posted on 01/20/2003 1:43:55 PM PST by GailA (Throw Away the Keys, Tennessee Tea Party, Start a tax revolt in your state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GailA
According to the History Channel saddam knew the timing of the Sats and halted movement of his equipment to fool them. Have they changed the timing schedules and gone to RANDOM searches? Thou shall NOT establish a pattern was a lesson that should have been learned after Pearl Harbor.

There's a problem: orbital mechanics make the patterns for you. Once you put the satellite into orbit, it falls around the Earth in a consistent pattern, the parameters of which (height above Earth, orbital inclination, et cetera) are easily observed by anyone with a good clock and a good telescope. Changing the ephemerides involves burning a LOT of fuel to generate the necessary velocity change (known as delta-vee).

90 posted on 01/20/2003 1:49:35 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
et cetera

If I hear it pronounced ex cetera one more time....

91 posted on 01/20/2003 1:51:59 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
et cetera

If I hear it pronounced ex cetera one more time....

You'll have to take some Excedrin? :o)

92 posted on 01/20/2003 1:53:17 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
U2 flights go exactly where and when you want them to. Satellites are in a certain orbit and can only see what is beneath them and then only when they happen to be overhead. Also the instrumentation on a U2 can be better and is more versatile.
93 posted on 01/20/2003 1:57:50 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I'm feeling dumb here. Do we have a plane called the U2? I thought Gary Powers got shot down in one of those 40 years ago. Wasn't the U2 replaced by the SR-71? Are those still flying?

The SR71 came after the U2 but we never stopped using U2s. I believe we have retired the SR71. Too expensive and only really useful to spy on the Soviets as they were the only ones who could hit a U2. Also, we have more satellites now.

94 posted on 01/20/2003 2:01:27 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Nope, way beyond that. My head will, quite simply, etplode!
95 posted on 01/20/2003 2:01:28 PM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: goldylight

Aurora?

96 posted on 01/20/2003 2:12:20 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
Aurora was the name of some program accidentially left in a congressional budget report/request. It was located on the lines below SR-71 and U2 lines.

Supposedly it's a hypersonic aircraft. It may be reponsible for chain contrails seen over various locations.
I don't believe it exists as a production aircraft. I believe it's simply a test aircraft.

The SR-71 was retired because of the cost of each mission as well as the fact that the russian SAM and aircraft were increasingly getting better. The SU-27, with it's onboard Infrared tracking system, can spot and trace the SR-71. While the Su-27 cannot keep up with a SR-71, various air to air missiles may be able to catch up to one. It may be a very hard chase and the SR-71 has an excellent chance of outrunning missiles, but at this point why take the chance?

I think the SR-71 was retired UNDEFEATED with the knowledge that missile technology had finnally caught up with this king of the sky. I believe it was thought that sattelites could fill the void -- and to a large degree they have.

As for why they are using a U2, it's cheap, can easily adapt to special instruments, and doesn't require astronaughts to fly it (SR-71 pilots wear astronaught suits. Not sure of their training).

I love the SR-71, and I hope I'm wrong about Aurora.
97 posted on 01/20/2003 2:22:02 PM PST by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dead
Uh, no.

They will pray and then Allah will send a "great flock of birds to smite the infidels."

That was an actual quote from one of these nutbags in Afghanistan a while back. It's about all the defense they have.

98 posted on 01/20/2003 2:25:37 PM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Looks like a Guppy giving birth. - Tom
99 posted on 01/20/2003 2:29:51 PM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
This is a part of the inspections regieme as per UN resolution.So Sadamm is not complying. That is a breach isnt it?

Yes, certain U2 flights are specified under one of the U.N. resolutions to ensure compliance with the resolutions associated with the Desert Storm cease fire.

Disallowing these flights would be a breach of the cease fire agreement and a violation of the U.N. resolution.

100 posted on 01/20/2003 2:30:34 PM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson