Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Great Satan
From what you're saying there is nothing that unusual about a first-time offender getting his conviction quashed like this in such a case

Actually, no. The DPAs are used for non-violent crimes like criminal non-support and such like, at least in this county. They are NOT used--at least in this area--for crimes of violence (battery, domestic abuse), sex crimes and drug cases (possession of cocaine, etc.). If it's a first time offender, it may--and I stress MAY--be plea bargained down to a municipal violation, but it may mean a few days in jail (usually time served) and a hefty fine plus court costs.

It may be that this county does use DPAs for sex crime cases, but the DA's head--along with the heads of the judges in my county--would blow up this was done in any sex crimes case here.

187 posted on 01/20/2003 2:02:37 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
What do you think the charge would be in this case?
192 posted on 01/20/2003 2:04:20 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
It may be that this county does use DPAs for sex crime cases, but the DA's head--along with the heads of the judges in my county--would blow up this was done in any sex crimes case here.

Yes, nobody, but NOBODY wants to be known as the judge or prosecutor who let a pedophile sex offender back out on the street with a wrist slap. Somebody "got to" somebody in Ritter's case. This smells to high heaven.

203 posted on 01/20/2003 2:18:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard (Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson