Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Austin Willard Wright
The author uses extremely dubious sources, including guilt by association

No, what the author demonstrates about King is guilt OF association. Knowlingly associating and cooperating with sworn enemies of you country, for that is what communists are, is a most unpatriotic and dishonorable act, and there can be no doubt that King was guilty of it.

Guilt by association is something else. Go take a logic class to find out what it means.

11 posted on 01/20/2003 8:39:11 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: traditionalist
Guilt OF instead of BY association. I love it! You are of course 100% correct, and have nailed the argument. Nice post.
13 posted on 01/20/2003 8:50:45 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist; 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
No, what the author demonstrates about King is guilt OF association.

Perfect 2 Kool, and thanks for the data! These little truths drive the King defenders nuts.

King may not have been a card-carrying member of the communist party, but there seems little doubt he was a strong communist "sympathizer."

19 posted on 01/20/2003 8:56:46 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson