Funny, "science" seems unaware of this amazing state of affairs. In fact, "science" is under the impression that Darwin's theories are more sound now than they have ever been, since the past 144 years of research has turned up confirmation after confirmation.
In fact, it's clear that what really honks you off is that science *does* accept Darwin wholeheartedly. So don't give us any of your nonsense about how "science" has refuted him.
Do you really think that lying helps your case?
Funny, "science" seems unaware of this amazing state of affairs.
Science is very much aware that evolution is total nonsense, that is why it keeps refuting it. In fact it is totally unbelievable that anyone would call evolution science in this day and age. It has been more utterly wrong than wrong-way Goldfarb:
1. The disproof of Darwin's racist claim that the brachyocephalic index showed what races were superior and which were inferior. While some may dismiss this as a minutae, it is a strong refutation of evolution because it shows that there has been no 'evolution' in the human species and according to evolutionists evolution is always going on.
2. Mendelian genetics showed that the transfer of new traits was very difficult if not impossible. Indeed because a new trait or mutation is not in the gene pool of other individuals, it has an almost impossible chance of survival.
2a. Mendelian genetics also showed the concept of alleles - duplicate genes in every organism which performed the same function but a bit differently. This allows the adaptation of a species to the environment without the need to wait for a chance mutation to occur. It shows that transformation of organisms is not necessary for survival.
3. DNA - a Nobel Prize winning discovery - showed the utter complexity of the cells in every organism. It laid to rest forever the concept that just a little mutation could transform an organism or a species.
4. Genome Project - showed the utter interrelatedness of every single gene, cell, part of the body. It has shown that it is impossible for any new trait to evolve by chance occurrence (or at random, or without design or whatever you wish to call how evolutionary changes to the genome are supposed to occur according to evolution). For any change, for any transformation to occur, there would need to be the coevolution of the new trait together with a complete support system to make it work. This of course is totally ludicrous, especially in view of 2 and 3 above.
5. discovery of gene control - showed forever that the arrogant (and moronic) evolutionist theory that 95% of DNA was just there doing nothing except to give proof of evolution was utter bunk. Science showed that it is that very DNA which evolutionists called 'junk" which is what controls the actions of genes and many other processes in the organism.
So as you can see, we are very lucky that scientists ignore evolution. Otherwise, biology would still be stuck in the dark Darwinian ages.