Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
True, but the claim was that ALL the industry produced was crap that no one wanted to listen to.

I sure don't want to listen to it. It's all dreck, as far as I'm concerned. They've ruined "country" music. It's now a kind of suburban-wife-pop-hits.

But I have no dog in this hunt, I suppose, as I don't have broadband and can't get it, since I live in the sticks. Still, I don't think it's fair to charge people a fee on the assumption that they are going to violate copyright.

52 posted on 01/20/2003 9:33:33 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
I don't think it's fair to charge people a fee on the assumption that they are going to violate copyright.

It's called "guilty until proven innocent."

53 posted on 01/20/2003 9:40:35 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts
We don't assume people are going to screw insurance companies, but we all pay for that too.
61 posted on 01/20/2003 12:10:19 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson