Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zarf
wouldn't matter what you or the others wanted to download if you simply pay a flat monthly or annual royalty fee that would be distrubuted to the industry

more farts in the wind; the economics of the net are that label bureaucracy is no longer in "demand." the economics and technology of recording is that the studios are not needed to support the better artists. the economics of entertainment is shifting away from central control. it was fun while it lasted, but it ain't about executive dining anymore. freedom is again crushing bureaucracy.

37 posted on 01/20/2003 6:16:50 AM PST by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: alrea
Nonsense. So you think music, software and other intellectual property should be free?

Once one person purchases a single copy (whether it's through Sony Music or from the creators own home web site) of the item they should be able to distribute it world wide without compensation to the creator?

You have no problem with this?

39 posted on 01/20/2003 6:27:55 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: alrea
the economics of the net are that label bureaucracy is no longer in "demand." ...freedom is again crushing bureaucracy.

The product in question is not label bureacracy, it's the music, and that very much is in demand. But you want to steal it rather than pay for you.

If I want a new Mercedes, I should be free to just go on the lot and take it? According to your definition of "freedom" I suppose so. Freedom is choosing between product 'A' and product 'B', not stealing whichever you choose.

56 posted on 01/20/2003 10:50:37 AM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson