[tdadams]

I'm sorry I seem not to be getting my point through. Let me try to simplify it.

Simplify as you see fit, but that's not the problem. The problem is you're simply unwilling to acknowledge the point I've made several times now. A copyrighted news article and contemporary music copyrights are given different consideration under the law. Until you realize and/or acknowledge that, there's no point in discussing this with you anymore. Go take a class in copyright law if you're still confused.

[Leroy S. Mort]

I notice you failed to address the rest of my comment: "Both issues involve the protection of income by the party holding the copyright, and an effort by others to deny or bypass that income through a violation of the copyright."

Are you disagreeing with that, or merely ignoring it?