Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw; DAnconia55
I do wonder, though, why the ADA would risk her job--and probably her career and law license (if not disbarment, at least a bar ethics investigation and a possible suspension of her law license)--for Scott Ritter.

Likeliest explanation that occurs to me is that some federal agency told her that hushing the matter up was a matter of national security. Would explain the judge going along.

269 posted on 01/19/2003 9:52:59 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
Likeliest explanation that occurs to me is that some federal agency told her that hushing the matter up was a matter of national security. Would explain the judge going along.

Those requests do not go to some lowly ADA, nor is an ADA authorized to make the decision. If she'd been approached by the feds, she would have to inform her boss. The feds go to the top guy, the District Attorney. The DA makes the decision whether to go along with it, then tells the ADA and the feds what he's going to do. In other words, it doesn't come from the bottom up, but the top down.

420 posted on 01/19/2003 12:14:26 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson