[rdb3]

And because few people now have enough respect for themselves and the constitution [sic] to either recognize or care about the infringements upon personal choice or individual freedom that the civil rights movement [sic] imposed.

Okay, RLK. Now tell me, why did anything have to be done for "civil rights" that would lead to such an extent as this?

Birth of Tha SYNDICATE, the philosophical heir to William Lloyd Garrison.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.

[RLK]

I am disinterested in being diverted from the primary issue. In the name if civil rights we have been bullied into surrendering rights no people who want to remain free should ever surrender. The first principle of a free society is that social and economic interactions occur on the basis of mutual agreement between participating parties. Any violation of that is a crime against freedom and humanity. The civil rights movement forced demands upon other people and hence violated that prime principle. I find my life and the lives of others subject to review and enforced social servitude as a result of the King legacy. I'm not a toy for others to play with or command.