Blix Tells Of New Iraqi Obstruction

cbs ^ | 1/19/03

[knak]

CBS) Chief United Nations biological and chemical weapons inspector Hans Blix told CBS News Anchor Dan Rather in an interview in Cyprus that Baghdad presented a new impediment Saturday to U.N. arms teams trying to do their job.

Blix told Rather that the Iraqis insisted that their helicopters go along with U.N. choppers taking the U.N. inspectors to a site in Iraq's nothern no-fly zone.

That, Blix explained to Rather, could be dangerous for the U.N personnel, since Iraqi craft operating in no-fly zones could be shot at.

As a result, Blix said, the inspection was cancelled.

He called that "something new to us and unacceptsble."

Blix said. "It's a bit of a cat and mouse play, again. If they are really sincere, if they want to create confidence, then they should give us the maximum freedom to go around the country wherever we want in the no fly zones or elsewhere, and I do not see any good justification for that demand."

Blix agreed with Rather's suggestion that the new Iraqi move isn't exactly a welcome sign for Blix, who is due in Baghdad Sunday along with the U.N.'s top nuclear arms inspector, Mohamed ElBaradei.

When asked by Rather, "Would it be accurate for tomorrow's headlines to read something along the lines of: UN inspectors tell Iraq 'you are not doing enough, you are not doing nearly enough'. Would that be one accurate headline," Blix agreed.

In the same session, ElBaradei confirmed to Rather that U.N. inspectors this week found papers in the private home of an Iraqi physicist on uranium enrichment of uranium, which could result in a material that could be used in a nucleaer weapon.

The physicist, Faleh Hassan, said the documents were from his private research projects and students' theses and he accused the inspectors of "Mafia-like" tactics.

However, ElBaradei told Rather that since the Iraqis had not disclosed information contained in the documents, "it obviously doesn't show the transparency we've been preaching."

[Support Free Republic]

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Thanks Registered

[The Obstinate Insomniac]

bump

[Mo1]

That, Blix explained to Rather, could be dangerous for the U.N personnel, since Iraqi craft operating in no-fly zones could be shot at.
As a result, Blix said, the inspection was cancelled.

What a load of BS .. something tell me that we would NOT shot down a UN helicopters

[Bogey78O]

No but they might get a stray round from flying near Irqi aircraft.

[EGPWS]

When asked by Rather, "Would it be accurate for tomorrow's headlines to read something along the lines of: UN inspectors tell Iraq 'you are not doing enough, you are not doing nearly enough'.

Interesting..Rather, Accurate, Headlines ALL in the same sentence.

[stylin19a]

This how it all started last time...Iraq didn't kick out the U.N. inspectors..the inspectors left...mostly because Iraq was imposing more & more conditions/restrictions.

[Chad Fairbanks]

I know I dont' speak for anyone else, but given half a chance, I think I would... ;0)

[cynwoody]

something tell me that we would NOT shot down a UN helicopters

Um, from fas.org:

14 April 1994 - A pair of UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters were shot down by 2 US Air Force F-15's flying out of Incirlik, Turkey. The F-15s misidentified the Black Hawks as Iraqi Hinds violating the "no fly" zone. All 6 crewmena aboard the helicopters were killed, along with 20 passengers, including UN observers in the Provide Comfort Zone and military officers from Britain, France and Turkey. An internal Department of Defense investigation into this friendly-fire accident was concluded on May 27, 1994. The helicopter crew members were apparently not aware of the correct transponder codes used to identify friendly aircraft for use within the area. Air Force leveled charges against six of the officers involved in the accident, including one of the F-15 pilots who mistakenly identified the Black Hawks as enemy aircraft. The Air Force later dropped charges against everyone except Captain Jim Wang, who had been in charge of the Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft monitoring both the fighters and helicopters in the "no fly" area. Captain Wang, senior director on board the E-3B AWACS aircraft, was charged on 31 August 1994, with five counts of dereliction of duty, and was acquitted at a court-martial of three counts of dereliction of duty 20 June 1995. Following an extensive aircraft accident investigation, the publication of a 24-volume report and a detailed multi-command review of procedures and policies, Air Force implemented a number of specific actions to preclude similar incidents in the future.

Obviously, Blix's worries are understandable, and the Iraqis know it and are attempting to exert a chilling effect on the inspection process by playing upon the inspectors' fears (not to mention eliminating the element of surprise that the UN helicopters would otherwise have). That in itself amounts to a "material breach".

[Momaw Nadon]

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool

[Mo1]

Obviously, Blix's worries are understandable, and the Iraqis know it and are attempting to exert a chilling effect on the inspection process by playing upon the inspectors' fears (not to mention eliminating the element of surprise that the UN helicopters would otherwise have). That in itself amounts to a "material breach".

I guess I was wrong

[Darksheare]

Heck, given half a chance, I'd shoot down the UN chopper...

[mhking]

Yet another material breach....

How much more of this horse hockey do we have to put up with?

[Boundless]

> .. something tell me that we would NOT shot down a UN helicopter

Apart from the historical fact that it has already happened once...

The purpose of the Iraqi choppers is not to draw fire, but more likely shoot down the UN chopper (with sidearms if need be) if it approaches certain areas that contain "material breach" evidence that even Blix couldn't rationalize away.

Reportedly, there was an Iraqi on board one of the final UN heli-inspections of the early 90s, and he lunged at the controls when it appeared that the chopper was headed for a hot spot.

The Iraqis will not allow any real discoveries if they can avoid them. If one is imminent, they'll deny entry, and the game will be over, just like last time. That day is inevitable, but the longer they can postpone it, the more time they have for whatever it is they're up to.

Blix doubtless knows all this, but prefered to put a different spin on the reasons for declining the honor of an airborne escort.

The UN guys are just "verifiers", not "investigators". And it sure as hell isn't their job to fire, or take, the first shot in whatever conflict may be around the corner.

What matters is that an inspection didn't happen, due to Iraqi interference. The cover story for "why" doesn't really matter that much.

[CampX]

I got a question for all that is bugging me.....if it is a no-fly zone, shouldn't it be a no-fly zone for everyone? Whats up with that? Is only coalition forces allowed to fly there?

[Boundless]

> .....if it is a no-fly zone, shouldn't it be a no-fly zone for everyone?

It's a no-fly zone just for Iraq. They agreed to it as part of the 1991 terms. This isn't a "keeping noisy Cessnas out of a National Park type" no-fly zone. It was specifically to keep the Iraqi Air Farce from attacking Iraqi citizens.

And they violate it just to whatever extent they think they can get a way with. And they shoot at coalition a/c flying in it, also in violation of the terms.

[Optimist]

And your point is? I assume you were trying to make a constructive addition to this thread?

[mhking]

I didn't say Bush. I didn't imply Bush. Unless you're going to address the question, please keep your snide remarks to yourself.