Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Digger
You know, he could have not filed a brief at all. Where is YOUR understanding of what can be accomplished in one court case?
42 posted on 01/17/2003 10:53:31 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
You know, he could have not filed a brief at all.

If what is being said on this thread about the brief that was filed is correct, not filing any brief would probably have been better. Now look for O'Connor, spurred on by this brief, to write a concurrence that repeats the ambiguities of Powell's opinion in Bakke.

55 posted on 01/17/2003 11:03:35 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
Yeah, the one guy we know is going to file a sloppy and ill considered brief is Theodore Olsen.
57 posted on 01/17/2003 11:03:50 AM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
how about one... Roe Vs Wade
141 posted on 01/17/2003 12:53:00 PM PST by DeathfromBelow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson