Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2003 9:58:56 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Free Republic Rocks, Big Time!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/17/2003 10:00:39 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Uh oh, does this mean more spam and you changing your mind about what to think?
3 posted on 01/17/2003 10:01:16 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
So today he's not the best President ever, right?
4 posted on 01/17/2003 10:03:02 AM PST by Wait4Truth (I HATE THE MEDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

6 posted on 01/17/2003 10:03:36 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Is our President doing this for future votes?
7 posted on 01/17/2003 10:05:21 AM PST by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW

10 posted on 01/17/2003 10:08:06 AM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
So, is Ruch an expert on Constitutional law, arguing before the Supreme Court and legal precedents? I take it he has been consulting with his knee-jerk legal experts again and is on a rant.

Bush didn't have to file a brief at all. Rush is NOT a legal expert. I stand with the President on this.

11 posted on 01/17/2003 10:08:07 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Bush's position is that racial diversity is good, but only if it is acheived based on merit.
20 posted on 01/17/2003 10:18:30 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats Piss Me Off !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Rush's accusations that Bush had abandoned the U of Michigan case were bizarre. He unloaded on Bush-but,did not offer any specifics,other than to trash Bush over and over,based on this apparent sentence in the brief (paraphrase)" racial diversity is a goal in college admissions or enrollment". Huh? What's wrong with that goal? That sentence doesn't say anything about affirmative action or racial quotas. Rush offered nothing substantive,no quotes from the brief ,no interviews with lawyers,other than that sentence taken from a liberal reporter's column.Rush could have gotten someone from Justice to further explain the brief,but as of now,the topic of the brief's wording, has been dropped.If Rush truly wanted to discuss the brief,he should have used someone from Justice as his source,rather than the words of a liberal columnist.Rush acted like Bush had personally authored the brief. I trust that Ted Olson did the right thing. Then Rush announced that he is taking 2 weeks and part of a third week off, to go to the Super Bowl and play in 2 golf tournaments.
49 posted on 01/17/2003 10:58:40 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Hmmm. Should I trust Ted Olson or Rush Limbaugh with the solicitor's job?
53 posted on 01/17/2003 11:01:37 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Raving Lunatic LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Does anybody have a link for the briefs yet?

If what is being reported about the briefs on this thread is correct, they are not DOJ's doing. This is somebody at the White House at work issuing orders.

If I understood the article in this morning's Washington Times correctly, DOJ was still hard at work revising the briefs shortly before midnight. Doesn't Bush go to bed early? Would he have been vetting the drafts at all, or did he delegate that task to somebody else?

59 posted on 01/17/2003 11:06:42 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Just heard Rush... (on tape-delay)... If true, very disappointing.
113 posted on 01/17/2003 12:25:19 PM PST by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
He is not happy and spent the first hafe hour on it and first call had to do with this subject

r u series?

Dan

115 posted on 01/17/2003 12:26:34 PM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Rush said, Rush said. Who cares what Rush said? Have you read the brief?

127 posted on 01/17/2003 12:39:49 PM PST by lawgirl (FREEP Congress--we need Bush's judicial nominees approved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
BUMP
229 posted on 01/18/2003 6:10:53 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson