We ALL impose our values upon others, all the time, even you. If you want to be left alone, there are a few islands for sale on eBay, I hear.
Well isn't *THAT* special.
I can see from your posts however that you do try to impose, to force your values and opinions on others.
Do we? Does a defender impose his "values" on an attacker by defending against the attack? Isn't that an argument from moral equivalence?
If you can see a moral difference between aggression and defense, then your forumula is too simple because it leaves out the most important bit.
An aggressor is trying to impose his values on his victim, theft, murder, whatever. The victim fights back and imposes his own value, self-survival, against the attacker's wishes.
According to you, these are moral equivalents -- both imposition of values.
But anyone else can see that it matters which one is acting in self-defense and which one is acting as aggressor.
Libertarianism is about acts in self-defense. Big government is about acts of aggression in pursuit of social engineering.