Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking; Poohbah; section9
You could say that.

Damn, this is gonna be ugly. 4,000 chemical warheads could be a LOT of trouble. We need to hit the sites with those shells with something that can incinerate the chemicals inside.

Poohbah, section9, could fuel-air bombs or white phosphorous do the job on that?
376 posted on 01/16/2003 11:56:55 AM PST by hchutch ("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
Poohbah, section9, could fuel-air bombs or white phosphorous do the job on that?

FAEs: only if they're RIGHT on top of the chemicals. Willie Pete: sure.

However, I'd just bomb 'em...and tell the Iraqis to "stay upwind and put some ice on it."

387 posted on 01/16/2003 12:00:39 PM PST by Poohbah (Strategery is a beautiful thing :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

To: hchutch
Anybody have info on whether they were warheads or just the actual payload? Or does it matter at all?


Patchdodd
390 posted on 01/16/2003 12:01:11 PM PST by patchdodd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson