Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813
Look at it this way. Instead of giving Chuckie Schumer 7% more than you wanted to give him, he's getting 10% less than he wanted.

What I've read on the other thread is that the split is 60/40.

34 posted on 01/15/2003 6:56:07 PM PST by wimpycat (Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: wimpycat
What I've read on the other thread is that the split is 60/40.


I think that may have been a bunch of wishfull thinking.... this article seems to indicate otherwise.... but in either case the democrats got more than previous minorities prior to the 107th.....

Them republicans are neogiating fools....
38 posted on 01/15/2003 7:01:22 PM PST by deport (DONATE A DOLLAR OR TWO TO THE FUNDRAISER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: wimpycat; gov_bean_ counter; PhiKapMom; MJY1288; Fred Mertz; bybybill; The Wizard; deport; ...
Look at it this way. Instead of giving Chuckie Schumer 7% more than you wanted to give him, he's getting 10% less than he wanted.

That was just his initial negotiating position.

When the Democrats use that kind of math to call a lower rate of government expansion a "budget cut," we call them spinning liars.

The Democrats were entitled to 33%. They asked for a 17% increase to 50%. The settled for a 7% increase to 40%.

They got more than they started with, we got less. They won, we lost.

If we had offered them 20% (instead of 33%), and they had settled for 25%, would we have lost?




57 posted on 01/15/2003 7:15:40 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson