What I've read on the other thread is that the split is 60/40.
That was just his initial negotiating position.
When the Democrats use that kind of math to call a lower rate of government expansion a "budget cut," we call them spinning liars.
The Democrats were entitled to 33%. They asked for a 17% increase to 50%. The settled for a 7% increase to 40%.
They got more than they started with, we got less. They won, we lost.
If we had offered them 20% (instead of 33%), and they had settled for 25%, would we have lost?