Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Space Wrangler
I could care less if the husband does or doesn't cry....fact is he has not taken a LDT....

if a family member goes missing...first thing you do if you want to find her/him is you eliminate yourself as a suspect so the cops can go find the real culprit....

that is not what the husband is doing here...

the husband, who lost 15 pounds poor thing....the husband is not helping the cops...he has not taken a LDT...and instead of begging for the return of his beloved wife on the TV...he slinks around in the background...

statistically...the husband is a logical suspect of this crime...that and the fact that he is not cooperating and his albi is flimsy make him an excellant suspect...

so its normal for most men to go on an adventure on Christmas Eve when your wife is pregnant and far along, when there would be ton of things to do in preparation for Christmas Eve and Christmas day celebrations?????

so here is a question if anybody knows....what did scott get Laci for Christmas?

16 posted on 01/15/2003 9:41:11 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: cherry
so here is a question if anybody knows....what did scott get Laci for Christmas?

Good question, but only relevant if he planned her "disappearance". If it was accidental, then there would have been presents under the tree for her. I can see an argument getting out of hand, rather than premeditated.

18 posted on 01/15/2003 9:59:35 AM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cherry
The fact that he hasn't taken a LDT means nothing to me. Keep in mind the cops are zeroing in on him from the start. If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't take the LDT either. They are useless. The only thing a LDT can do is persuade the criminals with low intellect to spill the beans, and that's all they are used for. They are in-admissable in court for a reason, and the reason is they are notoriuosly unreliable. I agree that SP is a prime suspect, as well he should be taking into consideration he was the last to see her, etc. But if I'm in his shoes, no way I take a lie detector either. How many times have you heard that a lie detector test was inconclusive? Inconclusive equals guilty, and you can bet a weeks pay that any info derived from a LDT WILL almost certainly be leaked to the press.

Like I said, he and his whereabouts need to be investigated vigorously, but all other leads must be checked out just as thoroughlly. Now, having said all of that, do you really think that if he went in and took a LDT and passed, that he would be dropped as a suspect?

20 posted on 01/15/2003 11:09:42 AM PST by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cherry
HE DIDN'T GO ON CHRISTMAS EVE. He went in the morning of that day. I don't know that many men who help their wives get food prepared, etc. for these events. Most of the wives would probably be happy to get them the he$$ out of the way so they can get it done themselves. Perhaps his lawyers advised him NOT to get a lie detector test. We do not know all the facts here. It's all supposition on our parts.
28 posted on 01/15/2003 1:13:25 PM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson