[Marysecretary]

Get a life, spectre. Just because I don't agree with YOU, I'm wrong? Is that it? Sorry. I have a right to disagree, just like you do. I'm not trying to be morally superior in any way. I just don't want to say he's guilty unless someone finds evidence that he is. Now, is that a wrong stance to take, spectre? He may well be guilty but I have a perfect right to withhold my judgement of him until he is found to be so.

[spectre]

My, my...hit a nerve?

I've had tougher people than you, not agree with me..but that isn't what this is all about.

What it's about is YOU think that even discussing the possibility that Scott may be guilty, untill proven in a court of law, makes the whole debate useless?!

Course, you are free to add your two cents, give us a few creative ideas where the poor girl might be, but obviously you choose not to engage in speculation.

Personally, I don't give a care WHAT your opinion is, as long as you don't deny me mine, which you are working very hard at doing.

sw