Support Dr. W. David Hager, President Bush and the Unborn

This resolution will probably be scheduled for the January 23 Assembly voting session. Please act immediately.

Assemblywoman Loretta Weinberg introduced the resolution, which urges opposition to the appointment of Dr. W. David Hager by President Bush to the FDA’s Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs. On January 9, the Assembly Health Committee voted this resolution out of committee by a party line vote of 6-1 and 1 abstention.

Dr. Hager has already been appointed to this position so it is a moot point. Abortion activists have attacked him because he is a member of the Christian Medical & Dental Association and has called for an objective FDA safety review of the abortion drug RU 486. These attacks on Dr. Hager are, by extension, attacks on every physician who holds similar values and are meant to embarrass President Bush.

* Dr. Hager has served as Clinical Research Investigator for the Centers for Disease Control and as an Assistant Surgeon with the U.S. Public Health Service. Board-certified in Obstetrics and Gynecology, he has delivered over 5500 babies and cared for thousands of women with compassion and competence--a vital qualification too often overlooked in the typical academic appointments to committees.

• Dr. Hager has also served on the faculty at Emory University School of Medicine and the University of Kentucky School of Medicine, earning the Educational Achievement Award from the Kentucky Medical Association. He has to his credit 41 journal publications, 14 book chapters and six books.

• He has written in high profile medical journals such as the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), the Journal of Reproductive Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). He serves as a reviewer for JAMA, AJOG, and three other journals.

• Dr. Hager has also edited two medical textbooks from highly regarded medical publishers, Infection Protocols for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Medical Economics, 1992) and Protocols for Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Blackwell Science, 1999) and written chapters on similar subjects in at least 13 other standard medical texts.

• In addition to the "Outstanding Physician in America Award" he received from Modern Healthcare Magazine in 1994, Dr. Hager was named one the "Best Doctors for Women" by Good Housekeeping Magazine in 1997 and then one of "Best Doctors for Women" in the Southeast by Ladies Home Journal in April of 2002.

AR216 will probably be posted for a vote by the full Assembly, Thursday, January 23, 2003. Contact your two Assembly members. Urge them to vote “No” on AR 216. To find out the names of your two assembly members, call the Office of Legislative Services at 1-800-792-8630 or go to the legislature’s web page at http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/legsearch.asp

Please vote “NO” on AR216. Dr. Hager has already assumed his position with the FDA so this resolution is absolutely meaningless. This resolution is meant to embarrass President Bush and is discriminatory because it is an attempt to disqualify qualified physicians who happen to be pro-life and hold religious views from ever being appointed to governmental agencies.

As a man who spent decades in the pharmaceutical industry, I can attest to the FACT that RU 486 will be responsible for the deaths of thousands of women ... usually young and frightened women unable to fathom the extent of their wrong choice to take such drastic chemical means as induced by this drug regimen.

When PBA became exposed as a heinous means to slaughter alive on life support individual human beings, the little understood facts of the 'procedure' eluded the public consciousness because of willful neglect of the truth by the media goons. The method for killing the unborn also exposed women to several hideous 'side effects' fromt he process, not the least of which is the premature delivery of an alive, struggling individual human due to the 'waiting period' during which the cervix is artifically dialated for the extraction and cannula suction step that termiiates a pregnancy and a living individual human being.

With RU 486 and the combination drug regimen it requires, women will be inducing abortions on their unborn under less than controlled medical conditions. This 'procedure' (and the inevitable illicit use of this drug regimen) will result in likely under reported (or not reported at all by a media hell-bent to support the societal engineers) incidents of massive bleeding and deaths of the women/girls grasping at 'cures for pregnancy' while fumbling blindly under the disinformation and outright lies of the abortion champions of NOW and NARAL. [end of rant]

Keep up the good fight, Coleus. I'm right behind you, friend.

Thanks,

Using RU 486 isn't is easy as they purport it to be for the mother and seems to torture and starve the baby before it is murdered, how hideous:

POST-IMPLANTATION

The best known example of this is the French abortion pill, RU 486 (Mifepristone).

How does RU 486 work?

RU 486 kills a developing baby after his or her heart has begun to beat. It blocks a vital nutrient hormone, Progesterone. The embryonic baby, who had implanted into the nutrient lining of the mother’s womb at least two weeks earlier, can be compared to a grape on a vine. If the stem is pinched, preventing the nourishing sap from reaching the grape, it will wither, die and drop off. Just so, if this drug is used, it causes the embryonic baby to wither and die. A second drug, prostaglandin, is used to expel the dead baby from her womb.

Counting from the first day of her last normal menstrual period, it is effective only from the fifth through the seventh week. Some claim success, but with decreasing effectiveness, into the 9th week.

RU 486 alone is effective from 60 to 80% of the time. If Prostaglandin is added, the abortion rate rises to 95%. Couzinet et al., "Termination of Early Pregnancy by RU-486 (Mifepristone), New Eng. J. of Med., vol. 315, no. 25, Dec. 18, 1986 O. Ylikorkala et al., Outpatient Abortion With RU-486, OB-GYN, vol 74, no. 4, Oct. 1989 M. Rodger et al., Blood Loss . . . After RU-486 and Prostaglandin...," Contraception, vol. 40, no. 4, Oct. 1989. Science Magazine, Sept. 1989

How is it used?

First Visit: She must have a thorough history, physical exam and blood count. If she’s anemic, has high blood pressure, kidney disease, asthma, has a vaginal infection, smokes or is over 35, she is rejected. Finally, she needs an ultrasound exam to confirm the age of her baby and to rule out a tubal pregnancy. She must sign permission and, in some states or nations, wait 1 or more days. Second Visit: She takes the pills.

Third Visit: She is given the prostaglandin drug. This produces hard labor. Usually the baby parts are passed that day.

Fourth Visit: If she has not aborted or if there is still bleeding, she will need an ultrasound to determine if the uterus is empty. If not, she needs a D&C. The

French Ministry of Health requires that the abortion facility be equipped with an EKG, IV equipment, and a "crash cart" with a defibrillator in the event of a heart attack resulting from the drugs.

There are complications?

Yes. Bleeding is the most common. In the controlled testing reported, one woman in a hundred bled so badly she either needed a D&C (surgical scraping out of her womb) and/or a blood transfusion. In an underdeveloped country, such a treatment would normally not be available and, very likely, some of these women would bleed to death. e.g., In a controlled trial in the state of Iowa, one woman took the pills and went home. She bled so badly She needed four emergency blood transfusions to save her life. Interruption of Preg. with RU-486 & Prostaglandin, Silvestre et al., N. Eng. J. Med., Vol. 322, 3/8/90, No. 10 Efficacy of Mifepristone & Prostaglandin in 1st Trimester Abortion, UK Multicentre Trial, Br. J. OB/Gyn, June ’90, Vol. 97, pp. 480-486

Other complications include substantial pain, tubal pregnancies, incomplete abortion, uterine rupture, e.g., an 18-week abortion with RU 486 and prostaglandin produced rupture of the uterus and a near fatality. Uterine Rupt.-Ab.-Second Trimester: J. Norman, Br. J. Ob/Gyn, vol. 102, Apr. ’95, p. 332

Psychological upset ranging from mild to serious, post-abortion syndrome and, in a few cases, death of the woman occur.

Are there problems with the baby?

RU 486 and a prostaglandin will produce an abortion 95% of the time. The rest will be advised to have a surgical abortion. But there will be some who will refuse surgery and carry to term. These babies will have a significant possibility of fetal deformity. Why?

Two poisonous drugs were given when the heart, limbs, etc., were being formed. This didn’t quite kill, but the effect can be to cause severe structural deformities as a direct toxic effect, similar to those from Thalidomide. This drug may have an action similar to DES, which was used in the ’60s to prevent miscarriage, and which turned out to be a chemical time bomb. RU 486 also can, in the body, react chemically to produce free radicals, which can combine with DNA, the genetic building blocks of our bodies. Through this mechanism fetal deformity can be produced at birth, and/or possibly show up 20 or more years later as a malformation or even cancer, such as the DES did. It is even possible that it could unite with maternal DNA to produce cancer or fetal defects in subsequent offspring. In addition, the drugs can cause genetic damage to the developing baby and, if to the mother, damage to children she bears later, similar to the DES drug tragedy.

In the tightly controlled French experience, there has been one such tragedy. Under the far looser private care in North America, the number of deformed babies should be greater.

Two French researchers report on two women who continued their pregnancies after their RU 486 failed to cause abortion. One delivered a normal baby. "The second pregnancy was terminated because of malformations (sirenomelia)" [fusion of lower extremities] J.C. Pons et al., letter to Lancet, Scrip, Sept. 26, 1991

Aren’t there therapeutic uses?

To date, there are no proven uses of RU 486 to treat any human illness. Research is underway testing whether it will have any beneficial effect on one type of breast cancer, on meningioma (brain tumor), Cushing’s Syndrome or endometriosis. No serious research is projected for any other conditions. Note that pro-life groups have never opposed research with RU 486 to find therapeutic uses. To date all studies of this drug were paid for by or associated with the manufacturer.

Where can I find more details?

A pamphlet, "RU 486, A Human Pesticide," is available from Hayes Publishing Company in Cincinnati Phone (513) 681-7559.

What about Methotrexate?

This also works to kill a baby after his or her heart has begun to beat. It works roughly within the same timeframe, but in a different fashion. The RU 486 essentially starves the baby which then dies and is lost. Methotrexate is a direct poison and kills the developing baby. Methothrexate & Misoprostol, M. Creinin et al., JAMA, Oct. 19, 1994 Methotrexate & Misoprostol to Terminate Early Pregnancy, R. Hausknecht, N. Eng. J.M., Vol. 333, No. 9, 8/31/95, Pg. 537

Is Methotrexate safe?

Definitely not. It is a cellular toxin and has been used for years to kill cancer cells. The object of cancer treatment is to kill cancer cells before the drug kills the patient. This is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. Most readers have known loved ones who have had chemotherapy. There are some serious side-effects at times -loss of hair, inability to digest food, diarrhea, anemia and even death. All of these have been caused by methotrexate. The trick is to use a dose just large enough to kill the sensitive embryonic baby but not large enough to do any serious damage to the mother.

It works alone?

No. It also needs a follow up dose of prostaglandin to empty the uterus.

What of Prostaglandin alone?

A pill form, Cytotec or Misoprostol, has been used in concomitant oral and vaginal doses. Its "effectiveness" is in question. Used without medical supervision in Brazil, it has frequently failed to produce abortions and, in a number of documented cases, has caused fetal deformity. Misoprostol & Congenital Malformations, W. Fonseca et al., Lancet, Vol. 338, July 6, 1991, Pg. 56

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.