Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
"Why is it so hard to believe that the Bible and the other global records recount a true event? "

But then again what’s wrong with critical analysis?

5 posted on 01/14/2003 6:56:39 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kerberos
But then again what’s wrong with critical analysis?

Well, it implies doubt, and therefore you are thus condemned to the eternal hell fires. Or so they say.

6 posted on 01/14/2003 6:58:54 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Kerberos
I don't see anything wrong with critical analysis.

I think the good Lord gave us brains and expects us to use them. The only problem with critical analysis is when people see something that doesn't match their expectations and arrogantly assume the good Lord must be wrong.

See my post #7.
8 posted on 01/14/2003 7:13:27 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Kerberos
Nothing is wrong with critical analysis. However, some (a lot, most)scientists seem to think science is totally pure and never wrong. It is their God. So their scientific studies can be clouded with the the bias of proving their own theories just as they would say a Christian would be biased in proving something because of their faith in the Bible.
9 posted on 01/14/2003 7:13:36 PM PST by TXBubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson