Mark Steyn: To the left, ideological purity trumps all

National Post ^ | January 13 2003 | Mark Steyn

[Freee-dame]

bump

[Brian Allen]

<< Okay, I like predatory. Can we add licentious and rapacious? >>

Abandoned? Amoral? And, least we forget, moronic!

[Jesse]

"I think Mark Steyn has just set a new high-water mark for columnists everywhere,"

So right. Steyn authors the kind of columns you want to carry around in your wallet so you can brandish them in the appropriate circumstance...trouble is, he writes so many great columns your wallet would be the size of a steamer trunk...

But this one is special. I am going to print it and mail a copy to Kennedy, Clymer and Pierce...just because.

[Rocky]

Oh, this is GOOD. Thank you, Mark Steyn.

[Victoria Delsoul]

How many changed lives justify leaving Miss Kopechne struggling for breath for hours pressed up against the window in a small, shrinking air pocket in Teddy's car?

He got away with murder. Shame on him!

[mrustow]

There is much brilliance in this column, and yet it has a fundamental flaw: Democrats (read: socialists) don't act based on ideology, but based on loyalties. The ideology is simply a rationalization for their momentary loyalties. In order to have an ideology, the Dems would first have to have ideas.

[Joan912]

But this one is special. I am going to print it and mail a copy to Kennedy, Clymer and Pierce...just because.

I could kiss you for that!

Steyn is the absolute best!