[dirtboy]

Weaseling out? I'll take that as an admission.

I'll take your statement there as an admission that you know nothing about logic. Once again, SPLC has made specific claims. You say you agree with them. If those claims are correct, you can find supporting info with Google. Now, if those items claimed by SPLC do not exist, exactly how do you propose that I locate non-existent items with Google? This should be interesting.

[hchutch]

But YOU are the one who has now accused SPLC of lying.

Show me where it is. I backed up one of the major allegations they made, not only in the news article, but I found that quote repeated ELEVEN TIMES on the website.

I have asked for documentation that their claim existed. You've not even posted a link. I've not only posted the documentation and the sources that I could find, I ALSO posted an instance where they retracted.

I will ask again:
When have they out-and-out lied?
Do you have links to show the lies and the evidence that refutes them?
When have they been sued for libel, slander, or defamation?
How did those cases turn out? Settlement, guilty, or not guilty?

You have called that organization, in essence, a liar. THAT burden of proof is on you, or are you going to make ME prove a negative?

Can't have it both ways.