Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

In other words, we are here dealing solely with the restriction imposed by the 16th Amendment on the right to resort to the source whence an income is derived in a case where there is power to tax for the purpose of taking the income tax out of the class of indirect, to which it generically belongs, and putting it in the class of direct, to which it would not otherwise belong, in order to subject it to the regulation of apportionment.

You forgot to mention that the tax discussed in this statement is upon real or personal property which is what is subject to apportionment at the time of Pollock, not upon the activities of individuals engaged in trades vocations or employments which are subject to excises under Article I Section 8 of the Constitution.

OOPs seems as you overlooked quite abit there.

267 posted on 01/15/2003 12:32:00 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer
OOPs seems as you overlooked quite abit there.
And here I thought I was clearing things up.
Carry on "Cut-n-Paste" King.
269 posted on 01/15/2003 12:54:04 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson