I never mentioned "The Law That Never Was".You mentioned the prime argument from that work--that argument being that the 16th Amendment was not properly ratified. I merely recognized the source of you claim, and applied the arguments used in that work as a general case, which you REALLY disliked.
I merely recognized the source of you claim, and applied the arguments used in that work as a general case, which you REALLY disliked.NO! What I REALLY disliked was your calling me a Judas and a liar! God you're dense!
And even being aware of the work you still believe that the amendment was properly ratified? Is their
In regards to yesterday's
statement by you can you show me where the imperfections came in to disallow the ratification of the Constitution according to "that crowd's" way of thinking? If it wasn't copied properly you should be able to prove that it wasn't.
Constitutional Topic: How a Bill Becomes a LawOnce a bill leaves the House and the Senate, it must be checked. If anything in the two versions of the bill differ, in any way (even in something as minor as punctuation), the bill must be reconciled.I think you're wrong. The FF were diligent men and wouldn't make the mistakes you attribute to them.