Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/13/2003 11:00:09 AM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Torie
Do you have any thoughts on this thread?
68 posted on 01/13/2003 9:22:35 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WL-law
In California the law specifies intentionaly receiving child porn. I don't see why other places should have a very different approach. It's always been possible for someone to just stuff some kiddie porn in your mailbox.
79 posted on 01/13/2003 10:39:56 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WL-law
3)Yes he was an 'end-user' (pardon the pun), but is that, or should that be, the proper focus of the authorities?

Yes. Without the end users paying for it, there would be no market, and the child abuse industry would be almost nonexistent. End users can also be dangerous to people around them.

80 posted on 01/13/2003 10:42:02 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WL-law
Yes, I know that purchases "fund" the criminal enterprise, but remember -- someone is trying to make you out to be a criminal because you drive an SUV based on the same logic...

You fund a criminal enterprise if you buy things that are illegal. Go back to square one and rethink this.

94 posted on 05/08/2003 9:42:39 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: WL-law
"child porn" seems to be a bit of a witch hunt to me.
97 posted on 05/08/2003 9:59:33 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson