[nopardons]

I have never, not once, on this thread, or any other, said that I was for a larger and ever larger government. That you keep saying that this is what I have said and think, doesn't make it true, dear. :-)

I write factual history and you babble on , rant, put words in my mouth, and have yet to disprove one thing that I have used as refutation. Language is expressed " thought. No wonder you are havinbg so much trouble ; you can't think cogently nor logically. Pity that. :-)

I make typos and more often than not miss correcting them. If THAT is your only criteria, for what is/is not a viable post,then your wrong. If pointing out my typographical errors is your only refutation, of what I have stated, then you have long ago lost the debate. LOL

[Leisler]

"I have never, not once, on this thread, or any other, said that I was for a larger and ever larger government. That you keep saying that this is what I have said and think, doesn't make it true, dear. :-) "

You are pathetic. On this tread alone you have supported
The Pure Act of 1906
The act of 1913.
All the thousands of various state and federal drug Acts.
And, had your panties bunched and wanted to sue. Yet another government remedy.