Replies

yes but that was back when I was not "robert paulson", bill clintong was barely president... and the "social democrats" dressed as republicans even knew this board existed.

Back then I was a compuserve number... on a political forum that only offered about six locations... one was linked to here... no blue, no pictures, just articles and discussions.

Now we fight about how much more is too much. The new "social christian democrats" want MORE MORE MORE...as long as it promotes their agendas. I want less less less, till my wallet fattens up a bit on paydays.

They obfuscate the REAL issue, the omnipotent power of an omniscient state, vs. the freemen concept of the "evil libertarians" even "evil republican libertarian caucus" here on freerepublic, by screaming drugs and abortion over and over again..

Do they KNOW that most small "l" libertarian leaning REPUBLICANS don't want to do drugs or kill babies? YUP... but making THAT the issue, instead of our need to defund the omnipotent state in matters NOT related to state security, helps keep those tax dollars and government spending programs flowing like milk from a pigs first teat.

25 mos into the current "conservative" president's administration, and they still have not outlawed partial birth abortion... but they sure as hell put up a fight over trent lott, right?

I sometimes wonder, if we cannot win such an open and shut issue at home, HOW can we hope to win the complex issues of peace and security abroad?

I wish we could have a little of both.
stupid me.

25 mos into the current "conservative" president's administration, and they still have not outlawed partial birth abortion...

Funny you mentioned that. I actually deleted words to this effect from my post to you:
"I predict Republicans ("conservatives"?) will eventually turn a blind eye to abortion long enough for it to become acceptable in the party. (Many, a growing number I believe, already do)"