Not at all. Women think differently than men, and have different core needs and values. This difference was never considered while designing our Constitution, and the introduction of this X-factor has led to unintended consequences. Through arguments posted above, I posit that it was at least a key contributing factor to the rise of American Socialism.
Men and women were not [created/evolved] to be equals, but to complement and complete one another. This is not to imply one is the lesser and one is the greater. Women have instincts to nurture, which should not be a chief function of government - but which is what we've come to. The mass of extra-Constitutional social programs, and the corresponding crushing tax burden is a testament to the power of that instinct.
There were bound to be unintended consequences of not just suffrage, but also (and perhaps as damaging) of a popularly elected Senate, and the income tax levy. With the introduction of these three factors, I believe that the rise of Socialism was almost inevitable.
This may be reflexively dismissed by some as kookery, but I feel there is enough empirical evidence to at least present the hypothesis for discussion.