Posted on 01/12/2003 7:06:53 AM PST by GailA
Emptying of death row in Illinois stirs outrage Action by governor inflames prosecutors, survivors of victims
By DON BABWIN, Associated Press January 12, 2003
CHICAGO - Calling the death penalty process "as capricious and arbitrary as who gets hit by a bolt of lightning," Republican Gov. George Ryan announced Saturday he was clearing Illinois' death row by commuting the death sentences of 156 condemned inmates, a move on a scale unprecedented in U.S. history.
Ryan's action, just two days before he leaves office, drew immediate angry reaction from prosecutors, the incoming governor and relatives of some of the victims.
Ryan said he sympathizes with the families of the men, women and children who were murdered, but he felt he had to act.
"I am not prepared to take the risk that we may execute an innocent person," he wrote in an overnight letter to the victims' families warning them of what he planned.
"Our capital system is haunted by the demon of error - error in determining guilt and error in determining who among the guilty deserves to die," Ryan said Saturday. "What effect was race having? What effect was poverty having?
"Because of all these reasons, today I am commuting the sentences of all death-row inmates."
All but three of the 156 inmates will now serve life in prison without possibility of parole. The three will get shorter sentences and could eventually be released from prison, though none will get out immediately.
Ryan had halted all executions in the state nearly three years earlier after courts found that 13 Illinois death-row inmates had been wrongly convicted since capital punishment resumed in 1977 - a period when 12 other inmates were executed.
He said studies conducted since that moratorium was issued had only raised more questions about the how the death penalty is imposed. He cited problems with trials, sentencing, the appeals process and the state's "spectacular failure" to reform the system.
"Because the Illinois death penalty system is arbitrary and capricious - and therefore immoral - I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death," he said.
Other governors have issued similar moratoriums and commutations but nothing on the scale of what Ryan announced.
"The only other thing that would match what he's done is in 1972 (when) the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the death penalty and 600 death sentences were reduced to life with that decision," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.
The most recent blanket clemency came in 1986 when the governor of New Mexico commuted the death sentences of the state's five death-row inmates.
Maryland Gov. Parris Glendening, who last year issued the country's only other moratorium on state executions, has no plans to pardon or commute the sentences of any death-row inmate before leaving office Wednesday, spokesman Chuck Porcari said.
Ryan chose Northwestern University - where journalism students investigating Illinois death-row cases helped exonerate some inmates - to publicly announce that he was commuting the 156 death sentences.
Corrections Department spokesman Sergio Molina said Ryan had signed commutation orders for 167 people - 156 on death row and the others in jails awaiting hearings or sentencings for other crimes.
Within a week the department will start moving prisoners out of the state's two condemned units" and into the general population of maximum-security prisons, Molina said.
Vern Fueling, whose son William was shot and killed in 1985 by a man now on death row, was outraged that the killer will be allowed to live.
"My son is in the ground for 17 years, and justice is not done," Fueling said. "This is like a mockery."
Incoming Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat, also criticized Ryan's action, calling blanket clemency "a big mistake." Each case should be reviewed individually, Blagojevich said. "You're talking about people who've committed murder."
Ryan on Friday went a step farther in four other death-row cases, issuing pardons for four men he said had been tortured by police into making false confessions.
A few hours later, Aaron Patterson, 38, walked out of prison a free man and ate his first steak dinner in 17 years, while Madison Hobley and Leroy Orange spent time with their families.
Stanley Howard, 40, the fourth man pardoned Friday, remained in prison. He had also been convicted of a separate crime for which he is still serving time. All four had been convicted in murders.
"It's a dream come true, finally. Thank God that this day has finally come," said Hobley, 42, as he left the Pontiac Correctional Center Friday.
Looking a bit dazed, Orange, 52, walked out of Cook County Jail with his two daughters by his side.
"Thank you with all my heart and please do something for the remaining group on death row," he said, addressing Ryan.
Ryan announced the pardons Friday at DePaul University in the first of two speeches capping his three-year campaign to reform the state's capital-punishment system.
Patterson's mother, Jo Ann, said she was overwhelmed when she heard the news.
"I don't believe in miracles, but this is a miracle," she said.
Reaction to the pardons from death-penalty supporters was swift.
Cook County State's Attorney Dick Devine said the future of the four men should have been decided by the courts. His office is trying determine if the pardons could be challenged, but Devine said the clemency powers for an Illinois governor are among the broadest in the country.
"Instead, they were ripped away from (the courts) by a man who is a pharmacist by training and a politician by trade," he said. "Yes, the system is broken, and the governor broke it today."
Ollie Dodds, whose 34-year-old daughter, Johnnie Dodds, died in an apartment fire that Hobley was convicted of setting, said she was saddened by Ryan's decision.
"I don't know how he could do it. It's a hurting thing to hear him say something like that," she said, adding that she still believes Hobley is responsible.
"He doesn't deserve to be out there."
Two words: BABY BOOM
It began with a sudden surge of births in 1946 and ended with a long decline in births in the 1960's.
There is a certain age range when young men are statistically prone to committing crimes than other ages, usually from around 16 through their mid 20's.
Take a look at that chart again with that in mind - the first wave of 1946 Baby Boomers would have turned 16 in 1962, right where the murder rate begins to rise. The last of them, born in the early to mid 1960's, would have turned 25 in the late '80s and early 90's, when the murder rate began to fall.
Correlation does not imply causation in either case, of course, but there's more to this issue than the simplistic picture that this chart paints. Some people are claiming the murder surge occurred because of leaded gasoline.
And the claim of the death penalty advocate is that the toughest prison thugs, when they committed their capital crimes 10 or 20 years prior, took a few moments of quiet reflection prior to setting upon and taking the life of their victims -- thinking forward to just that moment at Sing-Sing, weighing their options -- and decided that committing the crime was worth the risk of ending up being dragged down the long hallway to the chair.
Yeah right.
The quickest way to bring about a police state is to treat criminals like citizens and citizens like criminals. Here in Illinois, the government is ever blurring the distinction between the two.
So now state-sponsored killings are about "sending messages" to other inmates? If life in prison is just as bad, or worse, a punishment than death, then why bother putting them to death?
The fact that "justice" was too swift was precisely the problem in Illinois. There were as many proven-innocent individuals released from Death Row in Illinois over the past decade or so as they put to death.
As for your brother's neighbor, did he have DNA comparison reports for all the exeuctions he witnessed? How did he know what was justified and what was a result of trumped-up or sloppy evidence dressed up in the pretty facade of official-looking court publications?
It's about vengeance, I suspect, more than about "justice."
Sounds like the pangs of a conscience speaking
Steve - I agree with your sentiments too- Its bad enough weve locked up a percentage of innocent men thier entire lives, but to compound that with thier execution would be extremely reckless.
I'm in favor of the right to carry defensive firearms, and the right to use deadly force to stop an attacker who is threatening your life or the life of another, and am working on a project in California to guarantee that right in the state Constitution.
Now, I'm sure you're going to point out that a state execution is not an initiation of force, and I didn't say that it was.
But the basic point is that I don't trust the government far enough to give it the power to kill its own citizens. And based on the 50% exoneration rate in Illinois, I have a sense that my lack of trust has a basis in reality.
Sure, why not? I'm serious! And why bother preventing them from committing suicide, for that matter? Give them the tools they need. Certainly this scenario would have to be fleshed out a bit to handle the "cruel and unusual" and "torture" considerations, but it's perfectly practical and would probably wind up costing less than the death penalty.
Why does it always take me so long before I realize Im wasting my time?
I guess its because I logged onto Free Republic, the online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web., I presume Im having a discussion with a fellow Conservative. Just like I might presume Im having a discussion with a Libertarian if I logged on the online gathering place for independent, grass-roots Libertarianism on the web.
My mistake.
P.S. What is the online gathering place for independent, grass-roots Libertarianism on the web anyway?
PENALTY: the suffering in person, rights, or property that is annexed by law or judicial decision to the commission of a crime or public offense.
PUNISHMENT: (a) suffering, pain, or loss that serves as retribution, (b) a penalty inflicted on an offender through judicial procedure.
Some forms of penalty/punishment are fines, incarceration, and execution.
Clarity of word meaning aside, I agree with you central premise that the length of time it takes to execute killers is too long, and that the lethal injection method is too sanitized.
So it's about vengence after all, rather than the State simply taking the life of a presumed criminal?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.