First, I want to make it clear that our dialogue is not adversarial. We're simply communicating.
But, I am curious, just exactly what statement of mine to you perceive to be neofascist or racist? Because I want to be very sure I never use that statement again.
But you, on the other hand, sound as if you are in favor of unrestricted, give-em-all-a-big-sloppy-kiss liberal. I don't mean to sound disrespectful, that's just my perception.
Just because the racists are saying we need to severely monitor and limit immigration, does not mean that everyone who says we need to severely limit and monitor immigration is a racist.
After all, if Hale enters a house through the door, does that mean I've got to enter through the window?
I'm not saying your comments are anything. But I also remember when these guys were stealth posters here (and one was posting stuff from the WCOTC website just a few days ago before those posts were pulled and he was banned), and because they'd perceive you were sympathetic to their cause would start a dialog with you via freepmail. It wouldn't be along the lines of "Join The Biggest White Power Group in the World Seig Heil Rahowa," but much more subtle, primarily using first sympathy, understanding and identification with whatever part of their cause you'd express. After they'd rope you in, they'd set the hook. It usually wasn't WCOTC members, but the National Alliance. Of course, with Hale in the hoosegow, the future of the WCOTC, which really wasn't all that big, but noisy, is in doubt. I haven't checked on the National Alliance recently, but I do know since their leader died last year, they may well be in turmoil as well. But they have used FR as a place to recruit in the past. Whether they got any new members from here is unknown.
I will say Jim Robinson has done a commendable job of ferreting them out and banning them, but there have been posters that'll pop up under new screen names repeatedly, usually with a registration date a year or two prior, but with only recent posts.