Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texaggie79
Texaggie79 wrote:

LMAO, you just go in circles.

You claim, as you chase your own tail.

Constitution apparently means by "property" that nothing can be prohibited from us.

"Apparently"?. [see Harlen on due process]

What about bio/nuke weapons? Well we can make reasonable regulations on bio/nuke weapons.

Yep, so we have.

Why not drugs? Because that's not reasonable.

Yep, prohibitions made on drugs. guns, etc, are Constitutionally unreasonable.

Who says? The constitution.

How bout that kiddo, you've finally 'got it'. Congrats.

718 posted on 04/04/2006 5:37:50 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 717 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

So there we have it. All this "unconstitutional" bs is fake. We have come to the heart of the matter.

Drugs and wmds are both regulated through prohibiting private citizens from owning them. It's reasonable for wmds, but not drugs, so sayeth the tpaine, all mighty tpaine.


719 posted on 04/04/2006 9:32:17 AM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson