To: tpaine
A vial of some mind altering recreational substance is not a threat to your neighbors, or a "violation of their rights". So tpaine gets to decide for the rest of us, what is a real threat and what is not?
563 posted on
01/26/2003 10:20:39 AM PST by
Texaggie79
(seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
To: Texaggie79
People of states, cities, and or counties can prohibit that which is not guaranteed by the BoR and is viewed as a threat (i.e. violation of others rights).
556 Texaggie79
Life, liberty, and property are among the rights guaranteed, aggie. The type of property is not enumerated. See the 9th.
And, we have already disposed of your inability to discern a valid threat from your own fantasies.
557 tpaine
Therefore, you possess the constitutional right to own a vile of small pox in your home?
558 -aggie-
Sigh, -- a valid 'threat' redux, - for the umteenth time, aggie. Get a clue.
-- A vial of 'pox' is a very dangerous substance, the storage of which can be reasonably 'regulated' by the state.
- A vial of some mind altering recreational substance is not a threat to your neighbors, or a "violation of their rights".
I have quite a few such 'vials' displayed in my home, on the backbar.
561
So tpaine gets to decide for the rest of us, what is a real threat and what is not?
-aggie-
Nope, a jury of our peers make such decisions, my boy, after seeing reasonable cause of a 'threat' demonstrated in our courts.
-- Really aggie, -- shouldn't you start learning to use your mind before inserting foot in mouth?
564 posted on
01/26/2003 10:52:20 AM PST by
tpaine
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson