[Texaggie79]

Law? Are you having trouble understanding? It doesn't require a LAW. This is the structure of our country. There needs to be no LAW to say that you don't COMPLETELY own your property. You NEVER bought em in the first place.

Let me think of an easy way to get this across to you....
If you COMPLETELY owned your property, explain how the government can take it away if you gain it through ill ways, or if you don't pay your taxes, or if they utilize Eminent Domain? All you own dcw, is certain RIGHTS to that property. Want to know what rights? Go to your courthouse and look them up.

[dcwusmc]

You have gone beyond absurd. Yes, I am aware that, unless one insists otherwise and pays for them, different people can own different rights to the same piece of property. I am also aware that governments claim the authority to sieze one's land or property for non-payment of their levies. Which does NOT abrogate one's otherwise absolute ownership of that property. They use a doctrine similar to a mechanic's lien. And WRT any other siezure of property, absent a judgement of a court, such is done in a totally Unconstitutional manner. It does NOT mean you do not own your property; it only means that your rights are routinely violated by government minions. Which seems to set really well with you and the roscoe-bot.