Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Good grief, how dense can you get roscoe?

You are quoting a law in the constitution, the federal 'law of the land' claiming that it has no laws on the matter of slavery.

How daft.

465 posted on 01/18/2003 2:50:44 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
You are quoting a law in the constitution, the federal 'law of the land' claiming that it has no laws on the matter of slavery.

Which says that slavery is a matter of state law.

Crash, burn, whimper.

"This may require us to speak farther in regard to our opinions upon the general question of slavery. We think the Constitution of the United States was so framed as to give its protection to the institution in the organized States where it existed. But, notwithstanding the recent decision of the Supreme court of the United States, a body whose offically expressed opinions very many persons, we regret, are inclined to regard as too sacred to be called in question, notwithstanding this decision we have found no sufficient reasons to change a position previously maintained by us, that slavery is a matter of local policy, a subject for State legislation, a domestic institution existing, and existing only by virtue of municipal law, which the people of the State, and they only, can abolish, but which, as above stated, neither the people of the nation, or of any State possess any inherent right to plant on soil where it does not already exist." --Quindaro Chindowan, May 13, 1857

467 posted on 01/18/2003 3:03:42 PM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson