To: dcwusmc
Amazing? That smoking crack in a community isn't a human right?
If you lived off in your own land, on an island, perhaps, it's your right, but you don't have that right when in a state where your fellow citizens are threatened by your activity.
437 posted on
01/18/2003 12:12:31 PM PST by
Texaggie79
(seriously joking or jokingly serious, you decide)
To: Texaggie79
--- smoking crack in a community isn't a human right?
If you lived off in your own land, on an island, perhaps, it's your right, --
-- but you don't have that right when in a state where your fellow citizens are threatened by your activity.
437 -ta79-
You have a real problem with logic.
The reasonable regulation of dangerous substances are permissible by states. -- This is a given.
Outright prohibitions on 'dangerous' property by any level of government, have been well demonstrated on this thread as being against the very principles of our free republic, & our constitution.
Your inability to acknowlege that this fact works against your own freedom is telling.
Only fanatics for a 'cause' are so blind. What is your cause aggie?
-- Are you rational enough to tell us, to explain?
442 posted on
01/18/2003 12:30:59 PM PST by
tpaine
To: Texaggie79
Liberals make equivalent arguments for guns and drugs. The drug legalization fanatics make equivalent arguments for guns and drugs.
Blind fanaticism yields useful idiots.
445 posted on
01/18/2003 12:40:33 PM PST by
Roscoe
To: Texaggie79
No, tex, your amazing claims that ALL land in the U.S. is owned by FedGov. Please cite that claim.
450 posted on
01/18/2003 12:55:48 PM PST by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson