Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
The 9th and 14th say nothing about drugs being legal. The 2nd says everything about guns being legal. I repeat, no connection.

His letter was filled with points. None of them had anything to do with a connection to the 2nd amendment. The author probably wrote a similar letter to newspapers and churches substituting "1st amendment" for "2nd amendment" and claiming that "they're coming after you next".

"We're not fighting for drugs, we're defending the Bill of Rights!". Yeah, right.

16 posted on 01/11/2003 11:42:51 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
"It is essential that defenders of the 2nd Amendment understand that the whole Bill of Rights is under attack by the Drug War, and that assaults on the 2nd Amendment are a natural part of that trend.
What is the main premise of a gun-control law? It is that guns are implements which are too dangerous to entrust to the citizenry.
What is the main premise of Drug Prohibition? It is that drugs are substances which are too dangerous to entrust to the citizenry.
Both lines of reasoning say that because a few people abuse something, all Americans must be treated like children or irresponsibles. All use is abuse." -From the letter-

The 9th and 14th say nothing about drugs being legal. The 2nd says everything about guns being legal. I repeat, no connection.

The point is, - such rights do not have to be enumerated. Lord, but you are dense.

His letter was filled with points. None of them had anything to do with a connection to the 2nd amendment.

Read the quote above, and be ashamed of your blind denial of reality.

The author probably wrote a similar letter to newspapers and churches substituting "1st amendment" for "2nd amendment" and claiming that "they're coming after you next". "We're not fighting for drugs, we're defending the Bill of Rights!". Yeah, right.

Scoff if you must. - But you have lost all your credibility here, imo.

21 posted on 01/11/2003 12:23:00 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
The 9th and 14th say nothing about drugs being legal.

So. You figure that the 9th amendment, to be meaningful, should be worded something like this:

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage

to dispose of garbage
to chose the stype of dress
to drink coffee
to drink distilled spirits
to drink beer
to buy a car
to celebrate birthdays
to throw a party
to eliminate waste products
to wash clothes
to cook meals
to eat out
to cut lawns
to fly flags
to burp
to fart
to blow the nose
to wash the car
to operate a computer
to chose an operating system fot eh computer
to choose software
to write letters
to inherit property
to plant crops
to darn socks
to travel
to walk the dog
to sing
to snore
to rise early
to rise late
to spend money
to eat turkey
to eat chicken
to take medicine
(et endless cetera)

retained by the people.

Is that it?

87 posted on 01/12/2003 9:30:14 AM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
"We're not fighting for drugs, we're defending the Bill of Rights!". Yeah, right.

So, you don't get it. I guess it doesn't make you a bad person. Just less of an American than the Founders were hoping for. Buckle up, and Don't forget your helmet.

596 posted on 06/08/2005 1:24:28 PM PDT by FreeRadical (That's no Open Container, that's My Beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson