Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Next you'll be quoting the 9th Circuit?

In any case that is an insane 'finding'. -- The ninth amendment clearly says that "others retained by the people" shall not be denied.
Both the 7th Circuit and you are denying your own rights. -- Why? - Its irrational.

113 posted on 01/12/2003 12:35:43 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
Why do you insist on shooting the messenger? Pretend you're reading a newspaper or something.

I am not making these things up. I don't agree with them. They just are.

And I cite them only to refute your statements, not that they reflect my feelings. You can't just blatently throw around 9th Amendment and 14th Amendment as an argument. Do you expect people just to nod their head and say, "Yeah, 9th and 14th Amendment. Uh-huh. Right, tpaine says so"?

Keep in mind that the 9th Amendment was incorporated under the 14th Amendment, thereby blurring the distinction and separation between the States and the Federal government, which was what the 9th Amendment was supposed to do!.

In 200 years, the 9th Amendment was used only twice in a court decision, Griswold v. Connecticut (birth control) and Roe v. Wade (abortion). And even then, the rights of the individual could only be found in "emanations and penumbras" of the Amendment.

Robert Bork said of the 9th: "...no more interpretable than a waterblot on the Constitution." But you think that it guarantees the right to smoke dope. Ok.

121 posted on 01/12/2003 1:33:25 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson