Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush May Enter Affirmative Action Case...
Associated Press

Posted on 01/10/2003 6:25:04 PM PST by RCW2001

By Ron Fournier
AP White House Correspondent
Friday, January 10, 2003; 8:56 PM

WASHINGTON –– Bush administration lawyers are laying the groundwork to oppose a University of Michigan program that gives preference to minority students, a step that would inject President Bush into the biggest affirmative action case in a generation.

Bush himself has not decided what role, if any, the administration will play in the landmark case but several officials said Friday night he is unlikely to stay on the sidelines. White House political allies are planning to intervene against the Michigan program nonetheless.

The administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, pointed to Bush's record in Texas and their continuing review of Clinton administration affirmative action cases as signs that the president is inclined to oppose the university's policies. Furthermore, he is likely to suggest alternatives to racial preferences that still promote diversity, officials said.

Bush is awaiting formal recommendations from Justice Department and White House lawyers before making his decision.

The Supreme Court, in its most important case this year, is expected to rule on the constitutionality of programs that gave black and Hispanic students an edge when applying to the University of Michigan and its law school.

The issue is a lightning rod both for conservative voters who back Bush and for minority voters, whom Republicans are courting.

Further complicating the White House's decision is the fallout for the GOP from the racially provocative comments that cost Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., his job as Senate majority leader. Bush denounced Lott's remarks, which were widely interpreted as nostalgia for segregation.

Siding with white students so soon after the Lott controversy could be seen as an affront to blacks.

The administration is not a party to the Michigan fight and does not have to take a position. Traditionally, however, the White House weighs in on potentially landmark cases.

Bush must decide soon. Legal briefs opposing affirmative action are due to the court Jan. 16, and briefs supporting the Michigan admissions plans are due in February.

Lawyers for political allies of the White House are drafting friend-of-the-court briefs arguing that the University of Michigan policy is unconstitutional, administration officials said.

The Justice Department is awaiting word from Bush on whether to file a brief of its own. At the least, Bush is expected to take a public stand on the matter and explain his position that racial quotas are not needed to foster diversity, officials said.

In Texas, Bush opposed racial preferences in public universities and proposed instead that students graduating in the top 10 percent of all high schools be eligible for admission. Supporters say the policy increased diversity because many schools are largely minority.

Among the cases that would bolster their argument against the University of Michigan, officials said, is a 1997 affirmative action suit that supported a white high school teacher's claim that she suffered reverse discrimination when laid off from her job. A black teacher was retained.

The Clinton administration argued that the school district's affirmative action policy went too far and could not be justified merely by the notion that a diverse teacher corps is a worthy goal.

"A simple desire to promote diversity for its own sake ... is not a permissible basis for taking race into account," the government said then.

The brief was largely written by Walter Dellinger, former head of the Office of Legal Counsel and later the Clinton administration's acting solicitor general. Administration lawyers consider at least one other Dellinger brief, a case involving a Wisconsin teacher, as further basis to argue against the University of Michigan policy.

Contacted Friday, Dellinger said the reasoning assumed that there is some role for affirmative action but noted that the tool can be wrongly used.

"The general position taken was that while the use of race is sometimes permissible in educational settings, it must be narrowly tailored and shown to advance important educational goals," he said.

In a 1995 memo analyzing the effects of a Supreme Court case over affirmative action in government contracting, the Clinton administration's Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel noted that the Supreme Court has consistently rejected racial balancing as a goal of affirmative action.

"To the extent that affirmative action is used to foster racial and ethnic diversity, the government must seek some further objective beyond the achievement of diversity itself," said the memo, largely written by Dellinger.

© 2003 The Associated Press


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 421-429 next last
To: FreeReign
You know, I'm not sure the response of someone who himself has been stabbed in the back can accurately be described as stabbing in the back.
261 posted on 01/10/2003 10:56:44 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
You think that God is in any of the socialist churchs here in this country then your nuts!
God is where ever you call out his name!

Socialist Churches ??

And thanks .. now I'm singing the Cheers song

262 posted on 01/10/2003 10:57:09 PM PST by Mo1 (A PROUD BUSH BOT !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Bush gave Lott just enough rope to hang himself by letting Lott go on BET.

This is pure managment skill.

Saying Bush sent Lott to be on BET is crazy!

263 posted on 01/10/2003 10:57:10 PM PST by right way right (PBA ban is next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW; Mo1
I guess I must be out of my mind, LOL!
264 posted on 01/10/2003 10:57:40 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Fred Mertz
Bush bot attack! Bush idol worshippers attack trent who is well liked by Bush, you figure it out! :LOL
265 posted on 01/10/2003 10:58:27 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
LOL .. I guess
266 posted on 01/10/2003 10:59:31 PM PST by Mo1 (A PROUD BUSH BOT !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I wonder what they make of Lott being a committee chairman. If they approve of everything Bush does, they must approve. But I have a feeling their hatred of Lott trumps their Bushbottism.
267 posted on 01/10/2003 10:59:35 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
ok the only church he may be in is the salvation army church they don't cave!
268 posted on 01/10/2003 11:00:10 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What about Billy Idol? Did he play a part in this too? I just wanna make sure I have the conspiracy correct... Thanks in advance!
269 posted on 01/10/2003 11:00:33 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Dims have sown coming up. Watch and see. It's already happening

BUMP
270 posted on 01/10/2003 11:01:23 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"It is a ranch!"

Very good, nut boy! All the cowboys I know, dress like that, with feathers in their caps!

271 posted on 01/10/2003 11:01:47 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter (Ding, dong, dong, ding.......time for the insane to return to the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; TLBSHOW
**I was the recipient of Howlin's posting, and TLBSHOW's interpretation of it was, in my opinion, a perfectly reasonable one. I interpreted the posting in precisely the same way.**

Separated at birth?;-)

By the way, getting back to the original post - I'm for affirmative access/equal access. Let the best man/woman win. It's a concept worth fighting for, IMHO.
272 posted on 01/10/2003 11:03:17 PM PST by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
'm afraid I don't follow your logic. Can you spell it out more clearly?

First the WH is accused of wanting Lott out of the ML position and that is probably correct. Now, why would Lott go hat in hand to BET on WH "orders" if he had no guarantee that the WH would lend it's support to kep his position? Answer; the WH had already washed its hands of Lott and did not order him to do anything. Lott went on BET on his own and as a hail Mary attempt to keep his job. The WH had NO interest in rehabilitating Lott as ML so they had NO motive to "order" him to try. I was one of the most vehement critics of how Lott was lynched but he did absolutely NOTHING to defend himself and his BET appearance reminded me of why I didn’t like or respect him before this came up.

The WH has now placed all of the real conservative judges back into play that will have a REAL effect on the Affirmative Action issue and no one has the analytical ability to see that that is far more important than joining an insignificant court case that will have no real impact on AA at all. The real political courage is that Bush has re-submitted these judicial candidates defying the liberal’s, and my, certainty that he would never dare do such a thing after Lott.

273 posted on 01/10/2003 11:03:54 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
You know, I'm not sure the response of someone who himself has been stabbed in the back can accurately be described as stabbing in the back.

Ya know, I'm not sure what your response is so I won't take a stab at it, even if I'm facing your back.

274 posted on 01/10/2003 11:03:56 PM PST by FreeReign (keeping everybody's feet to the fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
breaking news


Breaking: LA Sheriff Preparing to Oust Tree Sitter


lol



275 posted on 01/10/2003 11:04:13 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
You're part of the racist party, in case you hadn't noticed.
276 posted on 01/10/2003 11:04:45 PM PST by Fred Mertz (Who you calling nut boy? pinhead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
You know, since everything is written down here, it doesn't take very long for someone to follow back, and see how difficult it is for you to comprehend the simple things....

To: FreeReign

Oh, I thought you said he stabbed us in the back when he went to BET. Did I misunderstand you?

241 posted on 01/11/2003 0:47 AM CST by aristeides [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

-------------------------------------------------------- To: aristeides

Myself, I have no idea if he had White House clearance, but the things he said on BET stabbed us in the back. 237 posted on 01/11/2003 0:45 AM CST by FreeReign (keeping everybody's feet to the fire.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

277 posted on 01/10/2003 11:06:07 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter (Ding, dong, dong, ding.......time for the insane to return to the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Trent trent trent

its about Affirmative Action Case

again any thoughts?
278 posted on 01/10/2003 11:06:14 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Admit it, you don't like Mississippians.
279 posted on 01/10/2003 11:06:49 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
LOL .. I guess I shouldn't mention my religion .. just might send you over the edge
280 posted on 01/10/2003 11:07:17 PM PST by Mo1 (A PROUD BUSH BOT !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson