Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Imal
From post #1: "Iraq might reveal that it has the pilot and then threaten
to execute him if U.S. forces invade."

My reaction to this would be to nuke one of their
cities where we know he isn't being held,

then issue an offical notice:

"If he isn't released, unharmed,
we'll continue to nuke an Iraq city each day.
If he's harmed, we'll nuke them all.
Have a nice day."

18 posted on 01/10/2003 4:50:23 AM PST by ASA Vet (Is this an Under Reaction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ASA Vet
My reaction to this would be to nuke one of their cities where we know he isn't being held, [...]

I know it's damned tempting in cases like this, but we are the Good Guys, and have to act like it.

The fact is, now that the U.S. is under new management, we are rapidly improving our "non-nuclear options" for dealing with mad dog criminals worldwide. And most of those options are far more unpleasant for their targets than instant vaporization.

If Capt. Speicher is being held in Iraq, those around him know for a fact that they will be held personally accountable for his well-being.

And Allah help them if they kill or mistreat him, because no one else in heaven, hell or on Earth will be willing or able to save them from the wrath of the Delta Force operators, who are expertly trained in extracting both information and vengeance without leaving any tracks.

Given the choice, I'd rather be nuked if I were in their shoes. It's better to die painlessly in a second than slowly and painfully over a period of days, weeks, months or years.

19 posted on 01/10/2003 5:07:40 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson